Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixes null extension bug #1698

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 26, 2024
Merged

Fixes null extension bug #1698

merged 3 commits into from
Jun 26, 2024

Conversation

MaggieKimani1
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #1695

Copy link
Member

@andrueastman andrueastman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Any chance you can add tests/assertions for the changes for the relevant extensions in the tests?
This would probably be an inverse of the test at

baywet
baywet previously approved these changes Jun 25, 2024
Copy link
Member

@baywet baywet left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

besides Andrew's comments, LGTM

Copy link

Quality Gate Failed Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
61.8% Coverage on New Code (required ≥ 80%)
C Reliability Rating on New Code (required ≥ A)

See analysis details on SonarCloud

Catch issues before they fail your Quality Gate with our IDE extension SonarLint

@MaggieKimani1 MaggieKimani1 merged commit ae79040 into vnext Jun 26, 2024
10 of 11 checks passed
@MaggieKimani1 MaggieKimani1 deleted the mk/fix-null-extension branch June 26, 2024 12:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

extension parsing mechanism should not fail if the extension returns null
3 participants