Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Categorize some failing libcxx tests #5231
Categorize some failing libcxx tests #5231
Changes from 1 commit
d93cbd1
dac8bf7
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not really sure where to put this one. The underlying issue is that [re.regex.construct]/1 does not specify the value returned by
flags()
as a postcondition on the default constructor, so MSVC STL returns 0 (which could be considered more in line with the postconditions on all the other constructors that require thatflags()
must return the flags passed to the constructor unchanged) while libc++ returnsregex_constants::ECMAScript
(which is probably informed by [re.synopt]/1's statement that the default grammar is ECMAScript if no other grammar is requested).LWG-3604 is related, but discusses the postcondition on the flags imposed by all the other constructors and argues that they are too strict. Here, the problem is kind of the opposite: The standard doesn't state a postcondition on the flags for the default constructor at all.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LWG-3604 does discuss this problem at the end:
I agree that there's no obvious place for this one - "LIKELY BOGUS TESTS" seems as good as anything, since if the Standard is vague on what happens, the test shouldn't be expecting something specific. Good enough for me, and a vast improvement over the status quo of "not analyzed".