-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix type-only imports in interface 'extends' and import=/export= #36496
Merged
Merged
Changes from 12 commits
Commits
Show all changes
15 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
2e47d4a
Handle when files get checked in different orders
andrewbranch 7e1382a
Fix interface extends clause
andrewbranch 419dba1
Fix import= something type only from a module
andrewbranch 7444b0b
Revert apparently unnecessary addition
andrewbranch 5e07751
Revert "Revert apparently unnecessary addition"
andrewbranch e69e292
Disallow `import = a.b.c` on anything with type-only imports
andrewbranch eaaf02c
Safety first
andrewbranch d2965af
Add test for TS Server single-file open
andrewbranch 455d3ae
Add big comment
andrewbranch b7d35b7
Extract error reporting function for import aliases
andrewbranch 890ba74
Delete blank line
andrewbranch 8ccfbf9
Merge branch 'master' into bug/type-only
andrewbranch a934999
Un-export, comment, and colocate some utils
andrewbranch 9a3f936
Combine 3 type-only marking function calls into one
andrewbranch 0972e5a
Add more export default tests
andrewbranch File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -2011,4 +2011,4 @@ namespace ts { | |
} | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} | ||
andrewbranch marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this call pair happens quite a few times. I think it should be extracted, perhaps into
markSymbolOfAliasDeclarationIfResolvesToTypeOnly
itself. I can't tell if it's possible and easy to regularize the other calls to accommodate the 1-export 2-resolved pattern.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I had the same thought when reviewing my own PR this morning, but stopped when I couldn’t come up with a satisfying name to add more logic to a function that already has a monstrous name. Any suggestions?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Combined all three type-only checks (1. declaration is marked type-only; 2. immediate alias is marked type-only; 3. final alias is marked type-only) into one
markSymbolOfAliasDeclarationIfTypeOnly
call