Feature/autogenstudio UI extra headers

[ronaldpereira]

Why are these changes needed?

Problem: The autogenstudio library lacked the ability to specify default headers for API requests. This caused issues when APIs required specific headers to be included in every request.

Solution: I've extended autogenstudio to accept an optional default_headers parameter. This parameter allows developers to define a dictionary containing the desired headers, which will be automatically included in all API requests generated by autogenstudio.

For example, when any custom API needed some extra headers to complete the request:
"default_headers": {"X-Requester-Token": "<requester_token>"}
The llm_config parameter already accepts this configuration, but it wasn't possible to pass it via the autogenstudio via model creation.

Checks

• I've included any doc changes needed for https://microsoft.github.io/autogen/. See https://microsoft.github.io/autogen/docs/Contribute#documentation to build and test documentation locally.
• I've added tests (if relevant) corresponding to the changes introduced in this PR.
• I've made sure all auto checks have passed.

Extra info

This MR was done originally in here, but it was needed to create this in the upstream repo for openai tests to run.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 50.00000% with 2 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 48.53%. Comparing base (372ac1e) to head (36483a7).
Report is 29 commits behind head on main.

Files	Patch %	Lines
autogen/oai/client.py	50.00%	1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2433       +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage   33.11%   48.53%   +15.41%     
===========================================
  Files          86       87        +1     
  Lines        9108     9340      +232     
  Branches     1938     2140      +202     
===========================================
+ Hits         3016     4533     +1517     
+ Misses       5837     4402     -1435     
- Partials      255      405      +150     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittest	12.70% <25.00%> (?)
unittests	47.78% <50.00%> (+14.66%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[rysweet]

Hi @ronaldpereira - we rebased this for you but it looks like there are still some conflicts. If you are still interested in bringing this forward please have a look at resolving the conflicts and greening the CI

[ronaldpereira]

Hello @rysweet,

The recent changes to the autogen studio have affected the database and UI design I've implemented, so adjustments will be needed to make this mergeable. I believe it would be more efficient to create a new branch from scratch using the current codebase, rather than trying to adapt the existing one in this MR.

Therefore, I'll close this MR for now and will open a new one, referencing this, once the new branch is ready.

Thank you for rebasing this MR for me.