This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 11, 2024. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 53
Add to safe query_interface class #174
Merged
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
FYI. In theory, E_POINTER would only be returned if the second parameter is null. The caller can guarantee that this is not the case. In practice, implementations will typically AV by dereferencing the pointer without bothering to check since this is a coding error by the caller. Either way, asserting here is not advised as wonky implementations may return some non-standard result.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Since only
E_NOINTERFACE
is expected it probably doesn't make a lot of sense to returnErr(hr)
instead?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@MarijnS95 Hmm I'm not sure what errors would be recoverable from here? I think in general, it's just a question of whether it worked or not, but perhaps you're right that for ultimate flexibility we should be returning an HResult on error so that if some implementation returns a non-standard error, the user can inspect that...