Sparse Index: log why the index is being expanded #691
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
It is sometimes difficult to support users who are hitting issues with sparse index expansion because it is unclear why the index needs to expand from logs alone. It is too invasive to set up a debugging scenario on the user's machine, so let's improve the logging. Create a new ensure_full_index_with_reason() method that takes a formatting string and parameters. If the index is not fully expanded, then apply the formatting logic to create the logged string and log it before calling ensure_full_index(). This should assist with discovering why an index is expanded from trace2 logs alone. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
These locations that previously called ensure_full_index() are now updated to call the ..._with_reason() varation using fixed strings that should be enough to identify the reason for the expansion. This will help users use tracing to determine why the index is expanding in their scenarios. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
These cases that call ensure_full_index() are likely to be due to a data shape issue on a user's machine, so take the extra time to format a message that can be placed in their trace2 output and hopefully identify the problem that is leading to this slow behavior. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
For safety, areas of code that iterate over the cache entries in the index were guarded with ensure_full_index() and labeled with a comment. Replace these with a macro that calls ensure_full_index_with_reason() using the line number of the caller to help identify the situation that is causing the index expansion. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
The recent changes update the callers of ensure_full_index() to call variants that will log extra information. This should assist developers assisting users who are hitting the sparse index expansion message. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
The clear_skip_worktree_from_present_files_sparse() method attempts to clear the skip worktree bit from cache entries in the index depending on when they exist in the workdir. When this comes across a sparse directory that actually exists in the workdir, then this method fails and signals that the index needs expansion. The index expansion already logs a reason, but this reason is separate from the path that caused this failure. Add logging to demonstrate this situation for full clarity. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
derrickstolee
force-pushed
the
sparse-index-why
branch
from
b8d1146
to
e751308
Compare
derrickstolee
commented
Oct 1, 2024
dscho
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 9, 2024
I will intend to send this upstream after the 2.47.0 release cycle, but this should get to our microsoft/git users for maximum impact. Customers have been struggling with explaining why the sparse index expansion advice message is showing up. The advice to run 'git clean' has not always helped folks, and sometimes it is very unclear why we are running into trouble. These changes introduce a way to log a reason for the expansion into the trace2 logs so it can be found by requesting that a user enable tracing. While testing this, I created the most standard case that happens, which is to have an existing directory match a sparse directory in the index. In this case, it showed that two log messages were required. See the last commit for this new log message. Together, these two places show this kind of message in the `GIT_TRACE2_PERF` output (trimmed for clarity): ``` region_enter | index | label:clear_skip_worktree_from_present_files_sparse data | sparse-index | ..skip-worktree sparsedir:<my-sparse-path>/ data | index | ..sparse_path_count:362 data | index | ..sparse_lstat_count:732 region_leave | index | label:clear_skip_worktree_from_present_files_sparse data | sparse-index | expansion-reason:failed to clear skip-worktree while sparse ``` I added some tests to demonstrate that these logs are recorded, but it also seems difficult to hit some of these cases.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I will intend to send this upstream after the 2.47.0 release cycle, but this should get to our microsoft/git users for maximum impact.
Customers have been struggling with explaining why the sparse index expansion advice message is showing up. The advice to run 'git clean' has not always helped folks, and sometimes it is very unclear why we are running into trouble.
These changes introduce a way to log a reason for the expansion into the trace2 logs so it can be found by requesting that a user enable tracing.
While testing this, I created the most standard case that happens, which is to have an existing directory match a sparse directory in the index. In this case, it showed that two log messages were required. See the last commit for this new log message. Together, these two places show this kind of message in the
GIT_TRACE2_PERFoutput (trimmed for clarity):I added some tests to demonstrate that these logs are recorded, but it also seems difficult to hit some of these cases.