-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 131
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add __createBinding and __setModuleDefault helpers #89
Conversation
cc @rbuckton do you have any feedback here, too? |
tslib.js
Outdated
@@ -273,4 +295,6 @@ var __classPrivateFieldSet; | |||
exporter("__importDefault", __importDefault); | |||
exporter("__classPrivateFieldGet", __classPrivateFieldGet); | |||
exporter("__classPrivateFieldSet", __classPrivateFieldSet); | |||
exporter("__createBinding", __createBinding); | |||
exporter("__setModuleDefault", __setModuleDefault) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure this actually needs to be exposed, since no TypeScript code will emit tslib_1.__setModuleDefault
(since its only used by __importStar
).
… directly referenced
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You forgot to remove __setModuleDefault
from one more location.
@@ -35,6 +35,8 @@ var __importStar; | |||
var __importDefault; | |||
var __classPrivateFieldGet; | |||
var __classPrivateFieldSet; | |||
var __createBinding; | |||
var __setModuleDefault; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
var __setModuleDefault; |
o[k2] = m[k]; | ||
}); | ||
|
||
__setModuleDefault = Object.create ? (function(o, v) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
__setModuleDefault = Object.create ? (function(o, v) { | |
var __setModuleDefault = Object.create ? (function(o, v) { |
@@ -34,3 +34,4 @@ export declare function __importStar<T>(mod: T): T; | |||
export declare function __importDefault<T>(mod: T): T | { default: T }; | |||
export declare function __classPrivateFieldGet<T extends object, V>(receiver: T, privateMap: WeakMap<T, V>): V; | |||
export declare function __classPrivateFieldSet<T extends object, V>(receiver: T, privateMap: WeakMap<T, V>, value: V): V; | |||
export declare function __createBinding(t: any, mod: any, k: string, k2?: string): void; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This should probably be:
export declare function __createBinding(t: any, mod: any, k: string, k2?: string): void; | |
export declare function __createBinding(t: object, mod: object, k: string, k2?: string): void; |
or
export declare function __createBinding(t: any, mod: any, k: string, k2?: string): void; | |
export declare function __createBinding(t: object, mod: object, k: PropertyKey, k2?: PropertyKey): void; |
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ export function __generator(thisArg, body) { | |||
} | |||
|
|||
export function __exportStar(m, exports) { | |||
for (var p in m) if (!exports.hasOwnProperty(p)) exports[p] = m[p]; | |||
for (var p in m) if (!exports.hasOwnProperty(p)) __createBinding(exports, m, p); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
exports.hasOwnProperty(p)
won’t work in case exports
has a null
prototype or has overridden hasOwnProperty(…)
: microsoft/TypeScript#37013 and #92.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We should probably get in the habit of saving off intrinsics like this (i.e. var hasOwn = Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty
and hasOwn.call(exports, p)
), but we don't necessarily want to have to introduce a __hasOwn
helper for that kind of case.
That said, its up to @weswigham if he wants to take on that change for tslib right now, since it's out of scope for this change.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That said, we do call Object.hasOwnProperty.call
in __importStar
below this.
Mmmm yes and no - the helper TS emits without |
We could always change that to the way that we define |
#99 now includes this, plus feedback~ |
This is the
tslib
PR for microsoft/TypeScript#35967