[ci] Publish test results #23477

dg0yt · 2022-03-10T06:22:35Z

What does your PR fix?

Publish CI results as AZP test results.
Which triplets are supported/not supported? Have you updated the CI baseline?

--
Does your PR follow the maintainer guide?

--
If you have added/updated a port: Have you run ./vcpkg x-add-version --all and committed the result?

--

dg0yt · 2022-03-10T07:06:55Z

Findings:
(https://dev.azure.com/vcpkg/public/_build/results?buildId=68588&view=ms.vss-test-web.build-test-results-tab)

While not building a single port for x64-osx (due to caching), the results contain 1910 tests (1617 "passed", 0 "failed", 293 "not executed", 0 "other").
Intial uploading x64-osx results for 1910 tests took 3 m 37 s, but for the other triplets it was < 10 s.
The original xUnit result file can be downloaded, for more details.
Summary for AZP on this PR's Checks tab in GH:

Failed: 0 (0.00%)
Passed: 13,146 (76.15%)
Other: 4,118 (23.85%)
Total: 17,264

dg0yt · 2022-03-10T08:22:03Z

Possible changes for vcpkg-tool xUnit output
(Implemented refers to scripts/process-test-results.ps1):

There should be some filtering and mapping of results to give useful analytics.
~~"Outcome" must be reported in /assemblies/assembly/collection/test/failure.Attributes["result"].Value.~~
Vcpkg reports a result attribtue (Pass/Skip/Fail), and it adds a reason element for skipped tests. This reason is not processed by AZP. It cannot be put into a failure element: The presence of a "failure" element is interpreted as a failed test.
Implemented: Test results are omitted for unaffected ports (unchanged ABI hash).

`vcpkg ci` result	AZP test analytics
SUCCEEDED	passed
BUILD_FAILED	failed
POST_BUILD_CHECKS_FAILED	failed
FILE_CONFLICTS	failed
CASCADED_DUE_TO_MISSING_DEPENDENCIES	not executed
EXCLUDED	not executed
CACHE_MISSING	---
DOWNLOADED	---

The "Test run" is taken from an AZP task property, not from the data. Thus for non-native triplets, this is insufficient to group results by triplet.
Implemented: The actual triplet is stored in the "owner" field.
"Test result" "Title" might be the full string of port, features, triplet, version (xUnit: /assemblies/assembly/collection/test.Attributes["method"].Value).
Implemented: port[features]:triplet
For "Test file", I would prefer the port name without triplet (xUnit: /assemblies/assembly.Attributes["name"].Value).
Implemented: port
It might be possible to include stdout as "Console log" (xUnit: /assemblies/assembly/collection/test/failure/output).
~~It might be possible to append other logs as "Attachements".~~
Not support by the AZP task.
It might be possible to put useful information in the "Stack trace".

References:
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/devops/pipelines/tasks/test/publish-test-results?view=azure-devops&tabs=xunit2%2Cyaml
https://xunit.net/docs/format-xml-v2

dg0yt · 2022-03-10T12:34:13Z

There is now also aggregated data for the "pipeline":
https://dev.azure.com/vcpkg/public/_test/analytics?definitionId=27&contextType=build

JackBoosY · 2022-03-11T02:20:21Z

cc @BillyONeal

github-actions

This is a new experimental fast check for PR issues. Please let us know if this bot is helpful!

PRs must add only one version and must not modify any published versions

When making any changes to a library, the version or port-version in vcpkg.json or CONTROL must be modified.

Error: Local changes detected for librttopo but no changes to version or port version.
-- Version: 1.1.0#5
-- Old SHA: d747c88d429ff781b11627623d0958967f912a41
-- New SHA: 5819abd14ead64303849e59b258dc8c492125610
-- Did you remember to update the version or port version?
-- Pass `--overwrite-version` to bypass this check.
***No files were updated.***

github-actions

This is a new experimental fast check for PR issues. Please let us know if this bot is helpful!

PRs must add only one version and must not modify any published versions

When making any changes to a library, the version or port-version in vcpkg.json or CONTROL must be modified.

Error: Local changes detected for librttopo but no changes to version or port version.
-- Version: 1.1.0#5
-- Old SHA: d747c88d429ff781b11627623d0958967f912a41
-- New SHA: 5819abd14ead64303849e59b258dc8c492125610
-- Did you remember to update the version or port version?
-- Pass `--overwrite-version` to bypass this check.
***No files were updated.***

github-actions

This is a new experimental fast check for PR issues. Please let us know if this bot is helpful!

PRs must add only one version and must not modify any published versions

When making any changes to a library, the version or port-version in vcpkg.json or CONTROL must be modified.

Error: Local changes detected for librttopo but no changes to version or port version.
-- Version: 1.1.0#5
-- Old SHA: d747c88d429ff781b11627623d0958967f912a41
-- New SHA: 5819abd14ead64303849e59b258dc8c492125610
-- Did you remember to update the version or port version?
-- Pass `--overwrite-version` to bypass this check.
***No files were updated.***

github-actions

This is a new experimental fast check for PR issues. Please let us know if this bot is helpful!

PRs must add only one version and must not modify any published versions

When making any changes to a library, the version or port-version in vcpkg.json or CONTROL must be modified.

Error: Local changes detected for librttopo but no changes to version or port version.
-- Version: 1.1.0#5
-- Old SHA: d747c88d429ff781b11627623d0958967f912a41
-- New SHA: 5819abd14ead64303849e59b258dc8c492125610
-- Did you remember to update the version or port version?
-- Pass `--overwrite-version` to bypass this check.
***No files were updated.***

github-actions

This is a new experimental fast check for PR issues. Please let us know if this bot is helpful!

PRs must add only one version and must not modify any published versions

When making any changes to a library, the version or port-version in vcpkg.json or CONTROL must be modified.

Error: Local changes detected for librttopo but no changes to version or port version.
-- Version: 1.1.0#5
-- Old SHA: d747c88d429ff781b11627623d0958967f912a41
-- New SHA: 5819abd14ead64303849e59b258dc8c492125610
-- Did you remember to update the version or port version?
-- Pass `--overwrite-version` to bypass this check.
***No files were updated.***

You have modified or added at least one vcpkg.json where a "license" field is missing.

If you feel able to do so, please consider adding a "license" field to the following files:

scripts/test_ports/cmake-user/vcpkg.json

Valid values for the license field can be found in the documentation

github-actions

This is a new experimental fast check for PR issues. Please let us know if this bot is helpful!

PRs must add only one version and must not modify any published versions

When making any changes to a library, the version or port-version in vcpkg.json or CONTROL must be modified.

Error: Local changes detected for librttopo but no changes to version or port version.
-- Version: 1.1.0#5
-- Old SHA: d747c88d429ff781b11627623d0958967f912a41
-- New SHA: 5819abd14ead64303849e59b258dc8c492125610
-- Did you remember to update the version or port version?
-- Pass `--overwrite-version` to bypass this check.
***No files were updated.***

You have modified or added at least one vcpkg.json where a "license" field is missing.

If you feel able to do so, please consider adding a "license" field to the following files:

scripts/test_ports/cmake-user/vcpkg.json

Valid values for the license field can be found in the documentation

github-actions

This is a new experimental fast check for PR issues. Please let us know if this bot is helpful!

PRs must add only one version and must not modify any published versions

When making any changes to a library, the version or port-version in vcpkg.json or CONTROL must be modified.

Error: Local changes detected for librttopo but no changes to version or port version.
-- Version: 1.1.0#5
-- Old SHA: d747c88d429ff781b11627623d0958967f912a41
-- New SHA: d9b335de3825f7538c76162745c1e0bf3010e783
-- Did you remember to update the version or port version?
-- Pass `--overwrite-version` to bypass this check.
***No files were updated.***

You have modified or added at least one vcpkg.json where a "license" field is missing.

If you feel able to do so, please consider adding a "license" field to the following files:

scripts/test_ports/cmake-user/vcpkg.json

Valid values for the license field can be found in the documentation

github-actions

This is a new experimental fast check for PR issues. Please let us know if this bot is helpful!

PRs must add only one version and must not modify any published versions

When making any changes to a library, the version or port-version in vcpkg.json or CONTROL must be modified.

Error: Local changes detected for librttopo but no changes to version or port version.
-- Version: 1.1.0#5
-- Old SHA: d747c88d429ff781b11627623d0958967f912a41
-- New SHA: 5819abd14ead64303849e59b258dc8c492125610
-- Did you remember to update the version or port version?
-- Pass `--overwrite-version` to bypass this check.
***No files were updated.***

You have modified or added at least one vcpkg.json where a "license" field is missing.

If you feel able to do so, please consider adding a "license" field to the following files:

scripts/test_ports/cmake-user/vcpkg.json

Valid values for the license field can be found in the documentation

dg0yt · 2022-03-12T08:46:22Z

I think this is good enough for merge now.
Using parent hashes, all test results for unaffected ports are removed. This gives a more representative result with regard to the impact of a PR. Unrelated baseline regressions will still show up via tests for affected ports with result type "other"/"not executed", reducing the "Pass percentage".

I couldn't find out why the features aren't displayed reliably. Maybe this it is just a side effect of the work being in progress in this PR.

CC @BillyONeal

BillyONeal · 2022-04-01T02:26:32Z

Are you happy with saying microsoft/vcpkg-tool#437 implements all the powershell stuff here and that only the stuff to get AzureDevOps to upload the bits should be kept here? (I understand not wanting to touch this until that lands in an actual tool release, I just want to make sure we're on the same page though)

dg0yt · 2022-04-01T04:33:33Z

I'm happy when the tool does the main work soon, and this PR can wait. However, it will make it harder to experiment with any further improvements. That's why I wonder if it shouldn't be merged as a script first.
And I am curious if CI regressions might be more visible from the pipeline's Unique failing tests table... Sometimes I'm not happy with the level of awareness for current CI health.

BillyONeal · 2022-04-05T18:45:00Z

However, it will make it harder to experiment with any further improvements. That's why I wonder if it shouldn't be merged as a script first.

Our experience is that such scripts become impenetrable messes and we've really been trying to make sure anything new that we do is done in the tool proper. Yes, that means we need a better end to end test experience to try out tool changes, and I'm on the hook to do that, and will be doing it after this Patch Tuesday where I get enough bits to build ourselves installed-by-default in the build lab.

@dg0yt

…ss. (#437) * Reduce build output chattiness. This change deletes the word "package" from several places where it is clear, and deduplicates "starting install" and "installing" messages. Before: ``` PS C:\Dev\vcpkg> .\vcpkg.exe install zlib Computing installation plan... The following packages will be built and installed: zlib[core]:x86-windows -> 1.2.11#13 Detecting compiler hash for triplet x86-windows... Restored 1 packages from C:\Users\bion\AppData\Local\vcpkg\archives in 43.57 ms. Use --debug to see more details. Starting package 1/1: zlib:x86-windows Installing package zlib[core]:x86-windows... Elapsed time for package zlib:x86-windows: 18.41 ms Total elapsed time: 2.266 s The package zlib is compatible with built-in CMake targets: find_package(ZLIB REQUIRED) target_link_libraries(main PRIVATE ZLIB::ZLIB) PS C:\Dev\vcpkg> .\vcpkg.exe remove zlib The following packages will be removed: zlib:x86-windows Removing package zlib:x86-windows... PS C:\Dev\vcpkg> .\vcpkg.exe install zlib --no-binarycaching Computing installation plan... The following packages will be built and installed: zlib[core]:x86-windows -> 1.2.11#13 Detecting compiler hash for triplet x86-windows... Starting package 1/1: zlib:x86-windows Building package zlib[core]:x86-windows... -- Using cached zlib1211.tar.gz. -- Extracting source C:/Dev/vcpkg-downloads/zlib1211.tar.gz -- Applying patch cmake_dont_build_more_than_needed.patch -- Applying patch 0001-Prevent-invalid-inclusions-when-HAVE_-is-set-to-0.patch -- Applying patch add_debug_postfix_on_mingw.patch -- Applying patch 0002-android-build-mingw.patch -- Using source at C:/Dev/vcpkg/buildtrees/zlib/src/1.2.11-e9a093319e.clean -- Configuring x86-windows -- Building x86-windows-dbg -- Building x86-windows-rel -- Installing: C:/Dev/vcpkg/packages/zlib_x86-windows/share/zlib/vcpkg-cmake-wrapper.cmake -- Fixing pkgconfig file: C:/Dev/vcpkg/packages/zlib_x86-windows/lib/pkgconfig/zlib.pc -- Using cached msys-mingw-w64-i686-pkg-config-0.29.2-3-any.pkg.tar.zst. -- Using cached msys-mingw-w64-i686-libwinpthread-git-9.0.0.6373.5be8fcd83-1-any.pkg.tar.zst. -- Using msys root at C:/Dev/vcpkg-downloads/tools/msys2/9a1ec3f33446b195 -- Fixing pkgconfig file: C:/Dev/vcpkg/packages/zlib_x86-windows/debug/lib/pkgconfig/zlib.pc -- Installing: C:/Dev/vcpkg/packages/zlib_x86-windows/share/zlib/copyright -- Performing post-build validation -- Performing post-build validation done Installing package zlib[core]:x86-windows... Elapsed time for package zlib:x86-windows: 4.83 s Total elapsed time: 7.009 s The package zlib is compatible with built-in CMake targets: find_package(ZLIB REQUIRED) target_link_libraries(main PRIVATE ZLIB::ZLIB) PS C:\Dev\vcpkg> .\vcpkg.exe x-set-installed The following packages will be removed: zlib:x86-windows Starting package 1/1: zlib:x86-windows Removing package zlib:x86-windows... Elapsed time for package zlib:x86-windows: 9.93 ms Restored 0 packages from C:\Users\bion\AppData\Local\vcpkg\archives in 92.5 us. Use --debug to see more details. Total elapsed time: 14.01 ms PS C:\Dev\vcpkg> .\vcpkg.exe remove zlib The following packages are not installed, so not removed: zlib:x86-windows Package zlib:x86-windows is not installed PS C:\Dev\vcpkg> ``` After: ``` PS C:\Dev\vcpkg> ..\vcpkg-tool\out\build\x64-Debug\vcpkg.exe install zlib Computing installation plan... The following packages will be built and installed: zlib[core]:x86-windows -> 1.2.11#13 Detecting compiler hash for triplet x86-windows... Restored 1 packages from C:\Users\bion\AppData\Local\vcpkg\archives in 60.79 ms. Use --debug to see more details. Installing zlib:x86-windows (1/1)... Elapsed time for zlib:x86-windows: 20.03 ms Total elapsed time: 2.662 s The package zlib is compatible with built-in CMake targets: find_package(ZLIB REQUIRED) target_link_libraries(main PRIVATE ZLIB::ZLIB) PS C:\Dev\vcpkg> ..\vcpkg-tool\out\build\x64-Debug\vcpkg.exe remove zlib The following packages will be removed: zlib:x86-windows Removing zlib:x86-windows (1/1)... PS C:\Dev\vcpkg> ..\vcpkg-tool\out\build\x64-Debug\vcpkg.exe install zlib --no-binarycaching Computing installation plan... The following packages will be built and installed: zlib[core]:x86-windows -> 1.2.11#13 Detecting compiler hash for triplet x86-windows... Installing zlib:x86-windows (1/1)... Building zlib[core]:x86-windows... -- Using cached zlib1211.tar.gz. -- Cleaning sources at C:/Dev/vcpkg/buildtrees/zlib/src/1.2.11-e9a093319e.clean. Use --editable to skip cleaning for the packages you specify. -- Extracting source C:/Dev/vcpkg-downloads/zlib1211.tar.gz -- Applying patch cmake_dont_build_more_than_needed.patch -- Applying patch 0001-Prevent-invalid-inclusions-when-HAVE_-is-set-to-0.patch -- Applying patch add_debug_postfix_on_mingw.patch -- Applying patch 0002-android-build-mingw.patch -- Using source at C:/Dev/vcpkg/buildtrees/zlib/src/1.2.11-e9a093319e.clean -- Configuring x86-windows -- Building x86-windows-dbg -- Building x86-windows-rel -- Installing: C:/Dev/vcpkg/packages/zlib_x86-windows/share/zlib/vcpkg-cmake-wrapper.cmake -- Fixing pkgconfig file: C:/Dev/vcpkg/packages/zlib_x86-windows/lib/pkgconfig/zlib.pc -- Using cached msys-mingw-w64-i686-pkg-config-0.29.2-3-any.pkg.tar.zst. -- Using cached msys-mingw-w64-i686-libwinpthread-git-9.0.0.6373.5be8fcd83-1-any.pkg.tar.zst. -- Using msys root at C:/Dev/vcpkg-downloads/tools/msys2/9a1ec3f33446b195 -- Fixing pkgconfig file: C:/Dev/vcpkg/packages/zlib_x86-windows/debug/lib/pkgconfig/zlib.pc -- Installing: C:/Dev/vcpkg/packages/zlib_x86-windows/share/zlib/copyright -- Performing post-build validation -- Performing post-build validation done Elapsed time for zlib:x86-windows: 5.137 s Total elapsed time: 7.36 s The package zlib is compatible with built-in CMake targets: find_package(ZLIB REQUIRED) target_link_libraries(main PRIVATE ZLIB::ZLIB) PS C:\Dev\vcpkg> ..\vcpkg-tool\out\build\x64-Debug\vcpkg.exe remove zlib The following packages will be removed: zlib:x86-windows Removing zlib:x86-windows (1/1)... PS C:\Dev\vcpkg> ..\vcpkg-tool\out\build\x64-Debug\vcpkg.exe remove zlib The following packages are not installed, so not removed: zlib:x86-windows Removing zlib:x86-windows (1/1)... PS C:\Dev\vcpkg> ``` * Built in implementation of microsoft/vcpkg#23477 . Needs tests. * Fix POSIX build failures. * ref-ize SpecSummary as re quested by @dg0yt * Use XmlSerializer to generate xUnit results * Localize touched messages Co-authored-by: Robert Schumacher <roschuma@microsoft.com>

github-actions

This is a new experimental fast check for PR issues. Please let us know if this bot is helpful!

PRs must add only one version and must not modify any published versions

When making any changes to a library, the version or port-version in vcpkg.json or CONTROL must be modified.

error: checked-in files for librttopo have changed but the version was not updated
version: 1.1.0#5
old SHA: d747c88d429ff781b11627623d0958967f912a41
new SHA: 144a5d16e71f2ceec96373e3f26b71d704bb9bec
Did you remember to update the version or port version?
Use --overwrite-version to bypass this check
***No files were updated***

github-actions

This is a new experimental fast check for PR issues. Please let us know if this bot is helpful!

PRs must add only one version and must not modify any published versions

When making any changes to a library, the version or port-version in vcpkg.json or CONTROL must be modified.

error: checked-in files for librttopo have changed but the version was not updated
version: 1.1.0#5
old SHA: d747c88d429ff781b11627623d0958967f912a41
new SHA: 144a5d16e71f2ceec96373e3f26b71d704bb9bec
Did you remember to update the version or port version?
Use --overwrite-version to bypass this check
***No files were updated***

github-actions

This is a new experimental fast check for PR issues. Please let us know if this bot is helpful!

PRs must add only one version and must not modify any published versions

When making any changes to a library, the version or port-version in vcpkg.json or CONTROL must be modified.

error: checked-in files for librttopo have changed but the version was not updated
version: 1.1.0#5
old SHA: d747c88d429ff781b11627623d0958967f912a41
new SHA: 144a5d16e71f2ceec96373e3f26b71d704bb9bec
Did you remember to update the version or port version?
Use --overwrite-version to bypass this check
***No files were updated***

dg0yt · 2022-06-11T21:02:36Z

https://dev.azure.com/vcpkg/public/_build/results?buildId=73559&view=ms.vss-test-web.build-test-results-tab
Apart from the outright bugs I solve with postprocessing, the tool's xunit output still isn't useful for AZP.

Durations are wrong.
While a PRs only installs "relevant" ports (and builds affected ports), the tool reports "Pass" for all ports which are not excluded.

github-actions

This is a new experimental fast check for PR issues. Please let us know if this bot is helpful!

PRs must add only one version and must not modify any published versions

When making any changes to a library, the version or port-version in vcpkg.json or CONTROL must be modified.

error: checked-in files for librttopo have changed but the version was not updated
version: 1.1.0#5
old SHA: d747c88d429ff781b11627623d0958967f912a41
new SHA: 144a5d16e71f2ceec96373e3f26b71d704bb9bec
Did you remember to update the version or port version?
Use --overwrite-version to bypass this check
***No files were updated***

dg0yt · 2022-06-12T09:20:11Z

With the updated post-processing (which should be equivalent to microsoft/vcpkg-tool#585), it is better again.

BillyONeal · 2022-06-15T07:18:02Z

This is one of the most amazing contributions ever, thank you so much again!

@dg0yt

* Update vcpkg-tool to 2022-06-15. See https://github.com/microsoft/vcpkg-tool/releases/tag/2022-06-15 * Add `=pass` entries from microsoft/vcpkg-tool#579 * Cherry pick XUnit output from #23477 which hooks up microsoft/vcpkg-tool#585 (Thanks again @dg0yt !) * Update release process document now that we can do the full tree rebuild to test the tool release before signing. Thank you: @autoantwort @christophe-calmejane @JackBoosY @benmcmorran @hmoffatt @klalumiere @Thomas1664 @Neumann-A @AenBleidd for your contributions! Fixes #22686 . Fixes #21800 . Fixes #16216 . Fixes #15836 . Full tree rebuild testing this update is: https://dev.azure.com/vcpkg/public/_build/results?buildId=73664&view=results

JackBoosY · 2022-07-15T05:48:14Z

Any progress on this PR? (I will keep this PR open anyway)

dg0yt · 2022-07-15T06:05:18Z

Progress is at 137%. Xunit output was improved directly in vcpkg tool, and CI test result upload has been added in other PRs. For future improvements, I can open a new PR.

dg0yt · 2022-07-15T06:09:06Z

PS: I added a branch protection rule to my fork so that the history with the XML post-processing remains accessible for reference.

github-actions bot approved these changes Mar 10, 2022

View reviewed changes

Adela0814 assigned JonLiu1993 Mar 10, 2022

JonLiu1993 assigned JackBoosY and unassigned JackBoosY and JonLiu1993 Mar 10, 2022

JackBoosY added the category:infrastructure Pertaining to the CI/Testing infrastrucutre label Mar 11, 2022

JackBoosY requested a review from BillyONeal March 11, 2022 02:19

github-actions bot approved these changes Mar 11, 2022

View reviewed changes

github-actions bot requested changes Mar 11, 2022

View reviewed changes

dg0yt force-pushed the test-results branch from ee8ade6 to 76403ce Compare March 12, 2022 06:09

github-actions bot requested changes Mar 12, 2022

View reviewed changes

dg0yt force-pushed the test-results branch from 76403ce to 6006ff4 Compare March 12, 2022 06:22

github-actions bot requested changes Mar 12, 2022

View reviewed changes

dg0yt force-pushed the test-results branch from 72be61b to 9122b2a Compare March 12, 2022 07:33

github-actions bot requested changes Mar 12, 2022

View reviewed changes

dg0yt force-pushed the test-results branch from 9122b2a to 1681399 Compare March 12, 2022 08:34

github-actions bot approved these changes Mar 12, 2022

View reviewed changes

dg0yt marked this pull request as ready for review March 12, 2022 08:46

github-actions bot approved these changes Mar 31, 2022

View reviewed changes

BillyONeal mentioned this pull request May 4, 2022

Update vcpkg-tool to 2022-05-05 #24526

Merged

dg0yt mentioned this pull request Jun 11, 2022

Fix xunit output errors, trim result list microsoft/vcpkg-tool#585

Merged

dg0yt marked this pull request as draft June 11, 2022 20:23

Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into test-results

710ab24

dg0yt force-pushed the test-results branch from caba87c to f031a35 Compare June 11, 2022 20:29

github-actions bot requested changes Jun 11, 2022

View reviewed changes

dg0yt force-pushed the test-results branch from f031a35 to 1bbb321 Compare June 11, 2022 20:38

github-actions bot requested changes Jun 11, 2022

View reviewed changes

dg0yt force-pushed the test-results branch from 1bbb321 to 4710fc9 Compare June 11, 2022 20:46

github-actions bot requested changes Jun 11, 2022

View reviewed changes

Restore xunit output and update result processing

ed4585c

dg0yt force-pushed the test-results branch from 4710fc9 to ed4585c Compare June 12, 2022 09:04

github-actions bot requested changes Jun 12, 2022

View reviewed changes

BillyONeal added a commit to BillyONeal/vcpkg that referenced this pull request Jun 15, 2022

Cherry pick microsoft#23477 .

c69919d

BillyONeal mentioned this pull request Jun 15, 2022

Update vcpkg-tool to 2022-06-15 #25226

Merged

ras0219-msft dismissed a stale review via ed4585c June 23, 2022 19:58

dg0yt closed this Jul 15, 2022

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

[ci] Publish test results #23477

[ci] Publish test results #23477

dg0yt commented Mar 10, 2022

dg0yt commented Mar 10, 2022 •

edited

Loading

dg0yt commented Mar 10, 2022 •

edited

Loading

dg0yt commented Mar 10, 2022

JackBoosY commented Mar 11, 2022

github-actions bot left a comment

github-actions bot left a comment

github-actions bot left a comment

github-actions bot left a comment

github-actions bot left a comment

github-actions bot left a comment

github-actions bot left a comment

github-actions bot left a comment

dg0yt commented Mar 12, 2022 •

edited

Loading

BillyONeal commented Apr 1, 2022

dg0yt commented Apr 1, 2022

BillyONeal commented Apr 5, 2022

github-actions bot left a comment

github-actions bot left a comment

github-actions bot left a comment

dg0yt commented Jun 11, 2022

github-actions bot left a comment

dg0yt commented Jun 12, 2022

BillyONeal commented Jun 15, 2022

JackBoosY commented Jul 15, 2022 •

edited

Loading

dg0yt commented Jul 15, 2022

dg0yt commented Jul 15, 2022

[ci] Publish test results #23477

[ci] Publish test results #23477

Conversation

dg0yt commented Mar 10, 2022

What does your PR fix?

Which triplets are supported/not supported? Have you updated the CI baseline?

Does your PR follow the maintainer guide?

If you have added/updated a port: Have you run ./vcpkg x-add-version --all and committed the result?

dg0yt commented Mar 10, 2022 • edited Loading

dg0yt commented Mar 10, 2022 • edited Loading

dg0yt commented Mar 10, 2022

JackBoosY commented Mar 11, 2022

github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

dg0yt commented Mar 12, 2022 • edited Loading

BillyONeal commented Apr 1, 2022

dg0yt commented Apr 1, 2022

BillyONeal commented Apr 5, 2022

github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

dg0yt commented Jun 11, 2022

github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

dg0yt commented Jun 12, 2022

BillyONeal commented Jun 15, 2022

JackBoosY commented Jul 15, 2022 • edited Loading

dg0yt commented Jul 15, 2022

dg0yt commented Jul 15, 2022

If you have added/updated a port: Have you run `./vcpkg x-add-version --all` and committed the result?

dg0yt commented Mar 10, 2022 •

edited

Loading

dg0yt commented Mar 10, 2022 •

edited

Loading

dg0yt commented Mar 12, 2022 •

edited

Loading

JackBoosY commented Jul 15, 2022 •

edited

Loading