-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: body_type NONE_VALUE checks #84
fix: body_type NONE_VALUE checks #84
Conversation
Warning Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThe changes across the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #84 +/- ##
========================================
- Coverage 6.38% 6.36% -0.03%
========================================
Files 77 77
Lines 6605 6628 +23
========================================
Hits 422 422
- Misses 6183 6206 +23 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- midealocal/devices/e6/message.py (2 hunks)
- midealocal/message.py (2 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (3)
midealocal/devices/e6/message.py (1)
6-6
: Change fromNone
toNONE_VALUE
forbody_type
is consistent with PR objectives.Also applies to: 16-16
Verification successful
The definition of
NONE_VALUE
is found inmidealocal/message.py
and it is correctly imported and used inmidealocal/devices/e6/message.py
.
midealocal/message.py: NONE_VALUE = 0x00
This confirms that the change from
None
toNONE_VALUE
forbody_type
is consistent and correctly implemented.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that `NONE_VALUE` is defined and imported correctly in the file. # Test: Search for the definition of `NONE_VALUE`. Expect: Definition found in the file or in imported modules. rg --type python $'NONE_VALUE' midealocal/devices/e6/message.pyLength of output: 93
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that `NONE_VALUE` is defined and imported correctly in the file. # Test: Search for the definition of `NONE_VALUE`. Expect: Definition found in the file or in imported modules. rg 'NONE_VALUE' --glob '*.py'Length of output: 735
midealocal/message.py (2)
93-93
: Updated condition to useNONE_VALUE
instead ofNone
in__str__
method.
147-147
: Updated condition to useNONE_VALUE
instead ofNone
inbody
method.
Summary by CodeRabbit
body_type
parameter to prevent errors by usingNONE_VALUE
instead ofNone
in message processing.