-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 975
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
metadata options seem to be ignored? #712
Comments
You need to put the {
"extractor": {
"deviantart": {
"postprocessors": [{
"name": "metadata",
"directory": "metadata"
}],
"include": ["gallery", "scraps"],
"metadata": true,
"extra": true,
"client-id": 0,
"client-secret": "012345",
"refresh-token": "012345"
}
}
} You also shouldn't use
|
Hi. Thanks, the thing with the postprocessor did the trick. The only remaining thing is now, that when downloading journals, it doesn't download linked sta.sh images in them. Is this expected to work, or am I making some mistake? Thanks. |
I got tricked too in the past by a similar misunderstanding. Indeed configuration.rst sometimes fails at explaining where to put some of the configuration directives. Suggested improvements:
|
@mikf Any idea about the thing with sta.sh images not downloaded for journals? Also perhaps one can rededicate this ticket to improve documentation for how to use metadata: Maybe as @Vrihub suggested, i.e. something like:
And for the metadata section something like: Thanks :-) |
Enabling |
Would sta.sh downloading work already for scraps? Since these seem to be just gallery items anyway? |
Just wondered, whether this is actually on the roadmap? :-) |
Sorry, I kind of forgot about this ... anyway: 41d0316 |
Thanks a lot. I guess this issue can be closed than. |
Hey.
I can't seem to get this working...
Having a config file like this:
When not specifying
--write-medata
on the command line, no metadata files are created at all. When specifying, they are written, butmetadata.directory
seems to be ignored.Also, at least
extractor.deviantart.metadata
doesn't seem to have any effect - with and without the very same data is extracted (i.e. no difference in license, and so on, as the documentation implies).Any ideas? Thanks,
Chris.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: