Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

tls-lwt: read add an optional ?off argument #510

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Aug 29, 2024

Conversation

hannesm
Copy link
Member

@hannesm hannesm commented Aug 29, 2024

useful e.g. in albatross where we may have partial reads.

lwt/tls_lwt.ml Show resolved Hide resolved
lwt/tls_lwt.ml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@hannesm hannesm changed the title tls-lwt: read and write have an optional ?off argument tls-lwt: read add an optional ?off argument Aug 29, 2024
@hannesm hannesm merged commit b8dad2f into mirleft:main Aug 29, 2024
1 check passed
@hannesm hannesm deleted the tls-lwt-read branch August 29, 2024 10:28
hannesm added a commit to hannesm/opam-repository that referenced this pull request Sep 4, 2024
CHANGES:

* tls-lwt: `read` now has an optional `?off:int` argument (mirleft/ocaml-tls#510 @hannesm)
* Use the kdf package instead of hkdf (mirleft/ocaml-tls#509 @hannesm)
avsm pushed a commit to avsm/opam-repository that referenced this pull request Sep 5, 2024
CHANGES:

* tls-lwt: `read` now has an optional `?off:int` argument (mirleft/ocaml-tls#510 @hannesm)
* Use the kdf package instead of hkdf (mirleft/ocaml-tls#509 @hannesm)
avsm pushed a commit to avsm/opam-repository that referenced this pull request Sep 5, 2024
CHANGES:

* tls-lwt: `read` now has an optional `?off:int` argument (mirleft/ocaml-tls#510 @hannesm)
* Use the kdf package instead of hkdf (mirleft/ocaml-tls#509 @hannesm)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants