You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm wondering if a system of "favorites" or "upvote/downvote" system could be useful in threads.
The thing is that there is a bit of noise in the thread list (e.g. all the "benchmark" emails) and there are some very interesting discussions. It's hard to find what's interesting to follow, either you have to read the mailing list daily and read most threads, either you can't follow #internals.
Just like in Reddit users could then read the most interesting threads of the last week, month, year. That could also allow to find interesting threads in the whole history of internals (important discussions, votes, RFCs, etc.).
Such ratings could also be used for search results: for example if you search for "strict types RFC" you could then find the original threads.
What do you think?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'm wondering if a system of "favorites" or "upvote/downvote" system could be useful in threads.
The thing is that there is a bit of noise in the thread list (e.g. all the "benchmark" emails) and there are some very interesting discussions. It's hard to find what's interesting to follow, either you have to read the mailing list daily and read most threads, either you can't follow #internals.
An upvote/downvote system would allow to
Just like in Reddit users could then read the most interesting threads of the last week, month, year. That could also allow to find interesting threads in the whole history of internals (important discussions, votes, RFCs, etc.).
Such ratings could also be used for search results: for example if you search for "strict types RFC" you could then find the original threads.
What do you think?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: