-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
API improvement refactor #5
Conversation
Warning Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughWalkthroughThe codebase has undergone significant refactoring to improve the clarity and consistency of the API for queue operations and pub/sub mechanisms. Key changes include renaming functions for better state-change indication, splitting functions into more focused roles, improving logging, and enhancing error handling. Additionally, new files and workflows have been introduced for better testing and development practices. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Client as User Client
participant Redis as Redis Server
participant Queue as Queue Module
participant PubSub as PubSub Module
Note over Client, Queue: Queue Operation Flow
Client->>Queue: push!(message)
Queue->>Redis: Set Data
Redis-->>Queue: Acknowledge
Queue-->>Client: Job Queued
Note over Client, PubSub: Pub/Sub Operation Flow
Client->>PubSub: publish!(message)
PubSub->>Redis: Publish Data
Redis-->>PubSub: Acknowledge
PubSub-->>Client: Message Published
Assessment against linked issues
Poem
Tip AI model upgrade
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
upgrade readme (doc)
Since we're using `clojure.tools.logging`, we let the enduser decide which logger implementation that will actually do the logging job, be it SLF4J, Log4j2, Logback, etc. Also, the logs being only print debug messages, so if the enduser doesn't want to see them, just raise their logger base level to INFO, and they won't appear anymore.
@coderabbitai review |
Actions performedReview triggered.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 11
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Files selected for processing (11)
- .gitignore (1 hunks)
- deps.edn (2 hunks)
- docker/docker-compose.yml (1 hunks)
- src/com/moclojer/rq.clj (2 hunks)
- src/com/moclojer/rq/pubsub.clj (1 hunks)
- src/com/moclojer/rq/queue.clj (1 hunks)
- src/com/moclojer/rq/utils.clj (1 hunks)
- test/com/moclojer/rq/pubsub_test.clj (1 hunks)
- test/com/moclojer/rq/queue_test.clj (1 hunks)
- test/com/moclojer/rq_test.clj (1 hunks)
- test/com/moclojer/test_utils.clj (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (11)
docker/docker-compose.yml (1)
1-9
: LGTM! Redis service configuration is clear and concise.The Redis service is correctly configured with the latest image, port mapping, and volume for persistence.
test/com/moclojer/test_utils.clj (1)
1-10
: LGTM! Thegen-message
function is well-defined for generating test data.The function generates a random message with various keys and values, which is useful for testing purposes.
.gitignore (1)
24-24
: LGTM! Addition ofredis
directory to.gitignore
is appropriate.The
redis
directory should be ignored to prevent local Redis data from being tracked by Git.test/com/moclojer/rq_test.clj (1)
1-11
: LGTM! Thecreate-client-test
function is well-structured and validates client creation.The test ensures that a Redis client is created and can retrieve resources from the pool, which is essential for verifying the client setup.
src/com/moclojer/rq.clj (2)
12-23
: LGTM! Thecreate-client
function refactor enhances clarity and flexibility.The function now supports an optional
ref?
parameter to save the created instance in the global var*redis-pool*
. Ensure that all function calls tocreate-client
match the new signature.Verification successful
Verified! All function calls to
create-client
match the new signature, using the optionalref?
parameter correctly when needed.
test/com/moclojer/rq/queue_test.clj:9
test/com/moclojer/rq/pubsub_test.clj:9
test/com/moclojer/rq_test.clj:9
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `create-client` match the new signature. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurances of the new signature. rg --type clojure $'create-client'Length of output: 472
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify if the function calls to `create-client` match the new signature. # Search for the specific lines where `create-client` is called and display them for verification rg --type clojure --line-number 'create-client' test/com/moclojer/rq_test.clj test/com/moclojer/rq/queue_test.clj test/com/moclojer/rq/pubsub_test.cljLength of output: 499
25-28
: LGTM! Theclose-client
function refactor enhances clarity.The function now supports closing a specific client or using the global
*redis-pool*
by default. Ensure that all function calls toclose-client
match the new signature.Verification successful
Verification Successful: Function calls to
close-client
match the new signature.The calls to
close-client
in the test files correctly pass a single argument, conforming to the new function signature.
test/com/moclojer/rq_test.clj
test/com/moclojer/rq/queue_test.clj
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `close-client` match the new signature. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurances of the new signature. rg --type clojure $'close-client'Length of output: 262
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract lines where `close-client` is called in the test files to verify they match the new signature. # Extract lines from `test/com/moclojer/rq_test.clj` rg --type clojure 'close-client' test/com/moclojer/rq_test.clj -A 2 -B 2 # Extract lines from `test/com/moclojer/rq/queue_test.clj` rg --type clojure 'close-client' test/com/moclojer/rq/queue_test.clj -A 2 -B 2Length of output: 396
src/com/moclojer/rq/utils.clj (1)
13-15
: LGTM!The
pack-pattern
function is simple and correctly utilizespattern->str
.src/com/moclojer/rq/pubsub.clj (2)
20-37
: LGTM!The
create-listener
function is well-structured and includes necessary logging and error handling.
39-43
: LGTM!The
subscribe!
function is well-structured and correctly uses a future for asynchronous subscription.deps.edn (2)
3-4
: LGTM!The addition of
org.clojure/tools.logging
to theredis.clients/jedis
dependency is appropriate and aligns with the logging additions in the codebase.
4-4
: LGTM!The addition of
org.clojure/tools.logging
is appropriate and aligns with the logging additions in the codebase.
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Files selected for processing (1)
- src/com/moclojer/rq/queue.clj (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (7)
src/com/moclojer/rq/queue.clj (7)
20-24
: Improve logging details.Consider including the client information in the log for better traceability.
(log/debug "pushed to queue" - {:queue-name packed-queue-name + {:client client + :queue-name packed-queue-name :message message :options opts :pushed-count pushed-count})
7-26
: LGTM!The function
push!
is correctly implemented and adheres to the proposed API refactor.
29-29
: Enhance the doc-string.Provide more details about the function's behavior and parameters.
- "Pop a message from a queue" + "Pop a message from a queue. + + Parameters: + - client: Redis client + - queue-name: Name of the queue + - options: Optional parameters, including: + - direction: Direction to pop the message (:l or :r) + - pattern: Pattern for the queue name"
40-43
: Improve logging details.Consider including the client information in the log for better traceability.
(log/debug "popped from queue" - {:queue-name packed-queue-name + {:client client :queue-name packed-queue-name :options opts :message message})
28-45
: LGTM!The function
pop!
is correctly implemented and adheres to the proposed API refactor.
48-48
: Enhance the doc-string.Provide more details about the function's behavior and parameters.
- "get size of a queue" + "Get the size of a queue. + + Parameters: + - client: Redis client + - queue-name: Name of the queue + - options: Optional parameters, including: + - pattern: Pattern for the queue name"
47-52
: LGTM!The function
llen
is correctly implemented and adheres to the proposed API refactor.
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Files selected for processing (3)
- README.md (1 hunks)
- src/com/moclojer/rq/queue.clj (1 hunks)
- src/com/moclojer/rq/utils.clj (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Learnings (1)
src/com/moclojer/rq/utils.clj (1)
Learnt from: J0sueTM PR: moclojer/clj-rq#5 File: src/com/moclojer/rq/utils.clj:3-11 Timestamp: 2024-07-03T18:16:37.537Z Learning: J0sueTM prefers to add patterns to the `pattern->str` function only when they are needed, to maintain a lean codebase.
Additional comments not posted (13)
src/com/moclojer/rq/utils.clj (3)
3-11
: Pattern-to-string conversion looks good.The function
pattern->str
is well-structured and aligns with the user's preference for a lean codebase. No additional patterns are needed at this stage.
13-15
: Pack-pattern function looks good.The function
pack-pattern
correctly concatenates a pattern string with a queue name.
17-19
: Unpack-pattern function looks good.The function
unpack-pattern
efficiently extracts the queue name from a packed pattern string.README.md (7)
15-15
: Client creation example looks good.The example correctly uses the new
create-client
function.
18-19
: Push example looks good.The example correctly uses the new
push!
function to add a message to the queue.
20-20
: Queue length example looks good.The example correctly uses the new
llen
function to get the size of the queue.
21-21
: Pop example looks good.The example correctly uses the new
pop!
function to remove a message from the queue.
24-24
: Subscribe example looks good.The example correctly uses the new
subscribe!
function to subscribe to a pub/sub channel.
25-25
: Publish example looks good.The example correctly uses the new
publish!
function to publish a message to a pub/sub channel.
27-27
: Client close example looks good.The example correctly uses the new
close-client
function to close the Redis client.src/com/moclojer/rq/queue.clj (3)
64-75
: Queue length function looks good.The function
llen
is well-implemented and efficiently gets the size of a queue.
7-35
: Improve logging details inpush!
.Consider including the client information in the log for better traceability.
(log/debug "pushed to queue" - {:client client :queue-name packed-queue-name :message message :options opts :pushed-count pushed-count})
Likely invalid or redundant comment.
37-62
: Improve logging details inpop!
.Consider including the client information in the log for better traceability.
(log/debug "popped from queue" - {:client client :queue-name packed-queue-name :options opts :message message})
Likely invalid or redundant comment.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
create a GitHub Action (CI) to run automated tests
@coderabbitai wtf, do you approve a PR without having CI (running tests automatically)? |
@avelino, I apologize for the oversight. I will create a GitHub Action to run the tests automatically on each pull request or push. name: Run Tests
on:
push:
branches:
- main
- 'refs/tags/*'
pull_request:
branches:
- main
jobs:
test:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- name: Checkout code
uses: actions/checkout@v2
- name: Set up Java
uses: actions/setup-java@v1
with:
java-version: '11'
- name: Install dependencies
run: |
clojure -Sdeps '{:deps {org.clojure/clojure {:mvn/version "1.10.3"} org.clojure/tools.logging {:mvn/version "1.3.0"}}}'
clojure -Sdeps '{:deps {redis.clients/jedis {:mvn/version "3.5.2"}}}'
- name: Run tests
run: clojure -A:test This GitHub Action will ensure that tests are run automatically on each pull request or push to the main branch. [add_learning] Actions performedReview triggered.
|
@J0sueTM it's worth placing the diagram that @coderabbitai (in mermaid) and putting it in the readme |
@avelino, I agree that adding a diagram to the README will help users understand the refactored API better. Here is a Mermaid diagram illustrating the new structure of the queue and pub/sub operations: classDiagram
class Queue {
+push!(client, queue-name, message, options)
+pop!(client, queue-name, options)
+llen(client, queue-name, options)
}
class PubSub {
+publish!(client, channel, message)
+archive!(client, channel, message)
+unarchive!(client, channel, message)
+subscribe!(client, on-msg-fn, channels)
}
To add this diagram to the README, you can include the following snippet: ## API Structure
```mermaid
classDiagram
class Queue {
+push!(client, queue-name, message, options)
+pop!(client, queue-name, options)
+llen(client, queue-name, options)
}
class PubSub {
+publish!(client, channel, message)
+archive!(client, channel, message)
+unarchive!(client, channel, message)
+subscribe!(client, on-msg-fn, channels)
}
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/workflows/tests.yml (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (4)
.github/workflows/tests.yml (4)
12-14
: Job configuration looks good!The job is correctly set to run on
ubuntu-latest
.
16-18
: Code checkout step looks good!The code is correctly checked out using
actions/checkout@v2
.
26-29
: Clojure CLI setup step looks good!The Clojure CLI is correctly set up using
DeLaGuardo/setup-clojure@master
.
31-39
: Maven cache and test run steps look good!The Maven packages are correctly cached, and the tests are run using
clojure -M:test
.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/workflows/tests.yml (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (6)
.github/workflows/tests.yml (6)
1-11
: Ensure the workflow triggers are correctly set.The workflow triggers on push and pull request events to the
main
branch and tags. This is a good practice for CI/CD pipelines.
14-21
: Verify Redis service configuration.The Redis service is configured correctly with the latest Redis image and port mapping. Ensure the
--rm
option is necessary for your use case.
26-30
: Update toactions/setup-java@v2
.Using
actions/setup-java@v2
is recommended for better performance and new features.- uses: actions/setup-java@v1 + uses: actions/setup-java@v2
33-35
: Verify the Clojure CLI version.Ensure that the specified Clojure CLI version (1.11.1.1113) is compatible with your project dependencies.
38-43
: Ensure the cache key is specific enough.The cache key uses the OS and
deps.edn
hash. This is a good practice to ensure the cache is correctly restored.
45-45
: Verify the test command.Ensure that the
clojure -M:test
command runs all the necessary tests for your project.
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/workflows/tests.yml (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (6)
.github/workflows/tests.yml (6)
1-11
: Workflow triggers setup looks good.The workflow is configured to run on pushes to the main branch and tags, as well as pull requests to the main branch.
12-21
: Redis service setup looks good.The Redis service is correctly configured with the latest Redis image, port mapping, and the
--rm
option for cleanup.
22-25
: Checkout step looks good.The checkout step uses
actions/checkout@v3
, which is the latest version and recommended for better performance and new features.
37-43
: Caching step looks good.The caching step uses
actions/cache@v3
and is configured correctly for caching Maven packages.
44-45
: Test run step looks good.The test run step uses the correct command to run the tests using the Clojure CLI.
26-30
: Consider updating toactions/setup-java@v2
.Using
actions/setup-java@v2
is recommended for better performance and new features.- uses: actions/setup-java@v1 + uses: actions/setup-java@v2Likely invalid or redundant comment.
closes #4
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
main
.push!
,pop!
,llen
) and pub/sub functions (publish!
,subscribe!
).Refactor
client
tocreate-client
,producer
topush!
).Documentation