Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix flaky tests #2553

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 21, 2023
Merged

Conversation

celinval
Copy link
Contributor

Description of changes:

This PR fixes a few flaky tests that started to fail in the ongoing toolchain update (#2551)

  • The object bits test itself doesn't create that many objects since an array is represented as the same allocated object. Use LinkedList instead.
  • Do not rely on property number.
  • Do not rely on the order that failed checks is printed.

Resolved issues:

N/A

Related RFC:

Optional #ISSUE-NUMBER.

Call-outs:

Testing:

  • How is this change tested? N/A

  • Is this a refactor change?

Checklist

  • Each commit message has a non-empty body, explaining why the change was made
  • Methods or procedures are documented
  • Regression or unit tests are included, or existing tests cover the modified code
  • My PR is restricted to a single feature or bugfix

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 and MIT licenses.

 - The object bits test itself doesn't create that many objects since
   an array is represented as the same allocated object. Use LinkedList
   instead.
 - Do not rely on property number.
 - Do not rely on the order that failed checks is printed.
@celinval celinval requested a review from a team as a code owner June 21, 2023 21:50
Copy link
Contributor

@jaisnan jaisnan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@celinval celinval enabled auto-merge (squash) June 21, 2023 22:38
@celinval celinval merged commit 43bc890 into model-checking:main Jun 21, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants