-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 653
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
REFACTOR-#1741: Use low-level api for kurt function implementation with defined level parameter #1719
REFACTOR-#1741: Use low-level api for kurt function implementation with defined level parameter #1719
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #1719 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 82.39% 84.03% +1.63%
==========================================
Files 77 77
Lines 7948 7948
==========================================
+ Hits 6549 6679 +130
+ Misses 1399 1269 -130
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
@amyskov I think we need a issue with example of different behavior |
97c67d7
to
1e47afc
Compare
Signed-off-by: Alexander Myskov <alexander.myskov@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Myskov <alexander.myskov@intel.com>
1e47afc
to
90b0b26
Compare
Current implementation of kurt function with level parameter uses apply version which invokes function on each Series of DataFrame, that is not corresponds with Pandas apply, which calls DataFrame method. Since Modin apply method is reworked in #1718 , behavior kurt with level parameter should be reworked too. |
…ementation with defined level parameter (modin-project#1719) Signed-off-by: Alexander Myskov <alexander.myskov@intel.com>
What do these changes do?
Sub PR of #1718 , function implementation slightly changed in order to better match Pandas behavior.
flake8 modin
black --check modin
git commit -s