You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Since #966 (2.16.0) most display-*-updates and update-* goals consistently support a set of common parameters to narrow the scope of used dependencies (allowMajorUpdates, allowMinorUpdates, allowIncrementalUpdates, ...) However, display-parent-updates does not.
If you agree I'm happy to contribute a PR to make sure display-parent-updates accepts the same parameters as update-parent.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
* Resolves#1016 - Align update-parent and display-parent-update
* Introduce DisplayParentUpdatesMojoOutputTest
* use SegmentUtils.determineUnchangedSegment
* Align DisplayParentUpdatesMojoTest and UpdateParentMojoTest
* Apply formatting rules
* update javadoc since annotation to 2.17.0 for newly introduced properties
* Align variable name between DisplayParentUpdatesMojo and UpdateParentMojo
* Align skipResolution && isBlank(parentVersion)
* Use Optional in favor of ternary operator
Since #966 (2.16.0) most
display-*-updates
andupdate-*
goals consistently support a set of common parameters to narrow the scope of used dependencies (allowMajorUpdates, allowMinorUpdates, allowIncrementalUpdates, ...) However, display-parent-updates does not.If you agree I'm happy to contribute a PR to make sure display-parent-updates accepts the same parameters as update-parent.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: