Correcting BoundArtifact comparison and eliminating incrementSegment #771
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
andrzejj0
commented
Oct 19, 2022
| return compareTo( ( (List<Item>) items ).iterator(), | ||
| ( (Iterable<Item>) o.items ).iterator(), artifactVersion.segment.value() ); | ||
|
|
||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @SuppressWarnings( "checkstyle:InnerAssignment" ) | ||
| private int compareTo( Iterator<Item> left, Iterator<Item> right, int comparisonLimit ) | ||
| private int compareTo( Iterator<Item> left, Iterator<Item> right, int comparisonsLeft ) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is the central part of this PR.
andrzejj0
changed the title
|
Tested your branch, All HTML Reports looks good to me. Great job! |
|
In that case I would consider it for the upcoming release. @slawekjaranowski what do you think? |
|
+1! I would go with release your code instead of my "increment forces snapshot" |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
So, I examined BoundArtifactVersion and especially the comparison and tried to rule out/handle all corner cases I could imagine.
The premise for that was that we were still using "-snapshot" to construct the lower bound such that all other versions would naturally (using how the current implementation of the Maven comparison works) be compared as more major. I didn't think this was good enough and implemented the same using BoundArtifact.
So, my idea was to, instead using "-SNAPSHOT" to denote the lowest possible version on a given segment, use a BoundArtifact representing an upper bound on the less major segment.
So, instead of 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT to denote the least possible version of "1.0.0", we could use something like 0.9.9-(infinity) to achieve the same (so, "attack" from the other side).
Because we're not actually using the
incrementSegmentmethod anymore, I removed that method. The ideal goal would be to make the "Comparator" classes actually implement the interface only, and not do auxiliary things like count segments. But that was not my goal here.This obviously does not need to go into the upcoming release. I've tested it, but maybe we should test it a bit more.