-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 391
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
update roadmap for 2024 #2310
update roadmap for 2024 #2310
Conversation
HardenedSteel
commented
Jun 24, 2024
- Remove return address proposal which had no activity/development.
- Mark Haveno as completed.
- Remove ring size task which is duplicate of Seraphis.
- Add "proposed task" status.
- Add ideas from Monero Research Lab
✅ Deploy Preview for barolo-time-757cf9 ready!Built without sensitive environment variables
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
^ updated the commit description https://deploy-preview-2310--barolo-time-757cf9.netlify.app/resources/roadmap/ |
Thanks! Some initial thoughts:
|
xmr <> ltc has been working via basicswap for a long time. Currently uses adaptor sigs will likely implement eth and bch swaps as well |
tbh XMR-BCH doesn't look very completed to me. and work on Seraphis not started should i change it to planned?
done
done
done |
@nahuhh since when? for adding to roadmap |
Just saw this. august 2023 for bi-directional xmr atomic swaps. |
We can get some MRL input on removing tych. That open ccs was refunded to the GF a while ago |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Triptych isn't coming. My understanding is that it has evolved into Lelantus Spark and Seraphis
edited excerpts without full context from an informal chat in monero lounge regarding layer2's below: (which is being deleted in this PR)
Rucknium mentions cores intentions of making layer 1 scale and "Since 7 years ago, a few papers on Monero payment channels have been published. No production code implementing them AFAIK" My thoughts on layer2's are that this was probably added because it's a popular buzzword and people bring it up a lot |
LWS subaddress support was completed as of Dec 2023 |
@nahuhh do you have link for it? |
I spoke with vtnerd to confirm subaddress support |
didn't add the commit link, not very useful for the roadmap |
The ETH<>XMR atomic swaps should likely move to completed as well. I'm not sure the date. I think May 2023, but need to double check
I'm personally ok with listing both BCH and ETH as completed. I don't believe we waited for a GUI before considering BTC<>XMR as complete, but considered "complete" to imply that there was a functional tool. |
resources/roadmap/index.md
Outdated
<li class="upcoming">{% t roadmap.returnaddr %}</li> | ||
<li class="upcoming">{% t roadmap.layer2 %}</li> | ||
<li class="ongoing">{% t roadmap.cuprate %}</li> | ||
<li class="upcoming"><a href="https://github.com/seraphis-migration/strategy/wiki">{% t roadmap.seraphis-jamtis %}</a></li> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
<li class="upcoming"><a href="https://github.com/seraphis-migration/strategy/wiki">{% t roadmap.seraphis-jamtis %}</a></li> | |
<li class="upcoming">{% t roadmap.seraphis-jamtis %}</li> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I believe we shouldn't link the FCMP for seraphis roadmap, instead we should link for FCMP roadmap itself
resources/roadmap/index.md
Outdated
<li class="upcoming">{% t roadmap.returnaddr %}</li> | ||
<li class="upcoming">{% t roadmap.layer2 %}</li> | ||
<li class="ongoing">{% t roadmap.cuprate %}</li> | ||
<li class="upcoming"><a href="https://github.com/seraphis-migration/strategy/wiki">{% t roadmap.seraphis-jamtis %}</a></li> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I believe we shouldn't link the FCMP for seraphis roadmap, instead we should link for FCMP roadmap itself
resources/roadmap/index.md
Outdated
<li class="upcoming">{% t roadmap.layer2 %}</li> | ||
<li class="ongoing">{% t roadmap.cuprate %}</li> | ||
<li class="upcoming"><a href="https://github.com/seraphis-migration/strategy/wiki">{% t roadmap.seraphis-jamtis %}</a></li> | ||
<li class="upcoming"><a href="https://www.getmonero.org/2024/04/27/fcmps.html">{% t roadmap.fcmp-plus %}</a></li> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this one
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you show me what you want to change/remove/keep? its not clear to me
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
move <a href="https://github.com/seraphis-migration/strategy/wiki">
line 243 from line 242
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
make these changes as @nahuhh seems to agree and we can review further. What will Seraphis codebase and jamtis
link to then?
bumping this: Tldr: BCH is marked as completed, so eth should be as well.
plowsof:
this is how id define completed ^. liquidity or consumer grade tooling isn't essential to completion.
At a glance, this is the last "low hanging" change. The rest LGTM |
- Remove return address proposal which had no activity/development. - Mark/Add Haveno, XMR <-> BCH/ETH atomic swaps, viewtags as completed. - Remove ring size task which is duplicate of Seraphis. - Remove layer 2 and return address - Add "proposed task" status. - Add ideas from Monero Research Lab Co-authored-by: plowsof <77655812+plowsof@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: nahuhh <50635951+nahuhh@users.noreply.github.com>
finally |