Batch with lazy enumerables (issue #400)

[leandromoh]

implements the requested of Optimize Batch to return lazy enumerables.

As requested here, all batches are buffered in different lists. So when you move on to the next batch, the one before becomes fodder for GC.

[leandromoh]

@atifaziz @Arithmomaniac
What do you think?

[Arithmomaniac]

I have my hands full, so unless @atifaziz asks me to do otherwise, I'm not going to review this.

[atifaziz]

@Arithmomaniac I've got my hands full here too so I doubted I'll get round to reviewing this any time soon. There's one more thing…we never decided in #400 that there is indeed a problem that needs addressing and what the solution would be so this PR jumps the gun for me. If @leandromoh is just sharing an experiment with an implementation here then that's fine but this isn't going to be a priority for me.

@Arithmomaniac Perhaps #400 should be closed seeing that no one has the time and that Batch isn't burning down the house for anyone? 😉

[Arithmomaniac]

@atifaziz I'm fine with this, but we should have a tag for things that were closed due to lack of interest if we don't already.

[atifaziz]

@Arithmomaniac There's already the won't-fix label for that but honestly, a closed issue that's not been tagged as either an enhancement, a bug or a task is essentially something that's been abandoned. Perhaps won't-fix is too strong for #400 as I feel it doesn't have a problem statement?

[Arithmomaniac]

Maybe "won't-implement"?

[leandromoh]

I cant see why close the issue If It was not resolved.

There is a lot of issues openned even without a PR. So why close this, that does?

[atifaziz]

Closing since #400 has been closed too.