Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: nonce check #289

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Aug 14, 2023
Merged

fix: nonce check #289

merged 3 commits into from
Aug 14, 2023

Conversation

MathisGD
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes a big issue introduced in #284 (I'm wondering if this refactor is really good in the end). I added some testing for this issue.

@MathisGD MathisGD self-assigned this Aug 14, 2023
@MathisGD MathisGD requested review from a team, Rubilmax, MerlinEgalite, pakim249CAL, Jean-Grimal, makcandrov, QGarchery and peyha and removed request for a team August 14, 2023 08:39
@pakim249CAL
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes a big issue introduced in #284 (I'm wondering if this refactor is really good in the end). I added some testing for this issue.

I've long held that fine tuning the way a signature is used should be outside the scope of what we do, and we should not touch it at all. I would suggest simply using a well established library or implement metatransactions.

@MerlinEgalite MerlinEgalite merged commit d0ba1ed into main Aug 14, 2023
@MerlinEgalite MerlinEgalite deleted the fix/nonce-check branch August 14, 2023 09:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants