Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Planning interface, port to ROS 2 #61

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 8, 2019

Conversation

vmayoral
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@vmayoral
Copy link
Contributor Author

vmayoral commented Apr 8, 2019

See #62 (comment) for this PR and all the ones before #60, #59, #55, #53, #52, #51, #44, #43, #42, #41, #40, #39, #8

Copy link
Contributor

@mlautman mlautman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Generally looks good but we have to fix moveit_ci so that we can verify this before merging

"The timeout for planning must be positive (%lf specified). Assuming one second instead.",
request_.allowed_planning_time);
request_.allowed_planning_time = 1.0;
}
if (request_.num_planning_attempts < 0)
ROS_ERROR_NAMED("planning_interface", "The number of desired planning attempts should be positive. "
RCLCPP_ERROR(LOGGER, "The number of desired planning attempts should be positive. "
"Assuming one attempt.");
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

clang format will fix this for you

@mlautman
Copy link
Contributor

mlautman commented Apr 8, 2019

I am going to merge this since the fixes are clearly a step in the right direction. I would recommend that we pause for a second and get CI working after we have moveit_core building in this repo

@mlautman mlautman merged commit 9bdc9d6 into moveit:master Apr 8, 2019
@vmayoral vmayoral deleted the planning-interface branch April 12, 2019 15:39
MikeWrock pushed a commit to MikeWrock/moveit2 that referenced this pull request Aug 15, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants