This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 1, 2022. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 473
Wait until a response from GV to animate the toolbar #10555
Labels
<toolbar>
Components: browser-toolbar, concept-toolbar
Comments
Mugurell
added a commit
to Mugurell/android-components
that referenced
this issue
Jul 6, 2021
…of InputResultDetail We need to wait until having a response from GeckoView on how it handled the touch only after which we'll know whether to animate the toolbar or not. The edgecase scenario of having pull to refresh enabled even before having a response from GeckoView will still work because "canOverscrollTop()" only checks for the touch to not be handled by the browser to pan the page.
Mugurell
added a commit
to Mugurell/android-components
that referenced
this issue
Jul 6, 2021
The previous implementation was affected by the fact that the class has 3 integer properties, all with values [0..4] (-1 was added recently) and it would just add those value to compute the hashcode. Collisions were a given. By using decimal places for each property the new implementation should avoid collisions while allowing for all the other expected guarantees.
Mugurell
added a commit
to Mugurell/android-components
that referenced
this issue
Jul 8, 2021
…of InputResultDetail We need to wait until having a response from GeckoView on how it handled the touch only after which we'll know whether to animate the toolbar or not. The edgecase scenario of having pull to refresh enabled even before having a response from GeckoView will still work because "canOverscrollTop()" only checks for the touch to not be handled by the browser to pan the page.
Mugurell
added a commit
to Mugurell/android-components
that referenced
this issue
Jul 8, 2021
The previous implementation was affected by the fact that the class has 3 integer properties, all with values [0..4] (-1 was added recently) and it would just add those value to compute the hashcode. Collisions were a given. By using decimal places for each property the new implementation should avoid collisions while allowing for all the other expected guarantees.
Mugurell
added a commit
to Mugurell/android-components
that referenced
this issue
Jul 8, 2021
This commented method seems to be a leftover from the previous refactoring. "behavior.forceExpand(..)" now calls "expandWithAnimation" for which we already have a test at line 450.
Mugurell
added a commit
to Mugurell/android-components
that referenced
this issue
Jul 12, 2021
…of InputResultDetail We need to wait until having a response from GeckoView on how it handled the touch only after which we'll know whether to animate the toolbar or not. The edgecase scenario of having pull to refresh enabled even before having a response from GeckoView will still work because "canOverscrollTop()" only checks for the touch to not be handled by the browser to pan the page.
Mugurell
added a commit
to Mugurell/android-components
that referenced
this issue
Jul 12, 2021
The previous implementation was affected by the fact that the class has 3 integer properties, all with values [0..4] (-1 was added recently) and it would just add those value to compute the hashcode. Collisions were a given. By using decimal places for each property the new implementation should avoid collisions while allowing for all the other expected guarantees.
Mugurell
added a commit
to Mugurell/android-components
that referenced
this issue
Jul 12, 2021
This commented method seems to be a leftover from the previous refactoring. "behavior.forceExpand(..)" now calls "expandWithAnimation" for which we already have a test at line 450.
Mugurell
added a commit
to Mugurell/android-components
that referenced
this issue
Jul 14, 2021
…of InputResultDetail We need to wait until having a response from GeckoView on how it handled the touch only after which we'll know whether to animate the toolbar or not. The edgecase scenario of having pull to refresh enabled even before having a response from GeckoView will still work because "canOverscrollTop()" only checks for the touch to not be handled by the browser to pan the page.
Mugurell
added a commit
to Mugurell/android-components
that referenced
this issue
Jul 14, 2021
The previous implementation was affected by the fact that the class has 3 integer properties, all with values [0..4] (-1 was added recently) and it would just add those value to compute the hashcode. Collisions were a given. By using decimal places for each property the new implementation should avoid collisions while allowing for all the other expected guarantees.
Mugurell
added a commit
to Mugurell/android-components
that referenced
this issue
Jul 14, 2021
This commented method seems to be a leftover from the previous refactoring. "behavior.forceExpand(..)" now calls "expandWithAnimation" for which we already have a test at line 450.
Mugurell
added a commit
to Mugurell/android-components
that referenced
this issue
Jul 16, 2021
…of InputResultDetail We need to wait until having a response from GeckoView on how it handled the touch only after which we'll know whether to animate the toolbar or not. The edgecase scenario of having pull to refresh enabled even before having a response from GeckoView will still work because "canOverscrollTop()" only checks for the touch to not be handled by the browser to pan the page.
Mugurell
added a commit
to Mugurell/android-components
that referenced
this issue
Jul 16, 2021
The previous implementation was affected by the fact that the class has 3 integer properties, all with values [0..4] (-1 was added recently) and it would just add those value to compute the hashcode. Collisions were a given. By using decimal places for each property the new implementation should avoid collisions while allowing for all the other expected guarantees.
Mugurell
added a commit
to Mugurell/android-components
that referenced
this issue
Jul 16, 2021
This commented method seems to be a leftover from the previous refactoring. "behavior.forceExpand(..)" now calls "expandWithAnimation" for which we already have a test at line 450.
mergify bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 16, 2021
…Detail We need to wait until having a response from GeckoView on how it handled the touch only after which we'll know whether to animate the toolbar or not. The edgecase scenario of having pull to refresh enabled even before having a response from GeckoView will still work because "canOverscrollTop()" only checks for the touch to not be handled by the browser to pan the page.
mergify bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 16, 2021
The previous implementation was affected by the fact that the class has 3 integer properties, all with values [0..4] (-1 was added recently) and it would just add those value to compute the hashcode. Collisions were a given. By using decimal places for each property the new implementation should avoid collisions while allowing for all the other expected guarantees.
mergify bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 16, 2021
This commented method seems to be a leftover from the previous refactoring. "behavior.forceExpand(..)" now calls "expandWithAnimation" for which we already have a test at line 450.
grigoryk
pushed a commit
to gabrielluong/android-components
that referenced
this issue
Sep 11, 2021
…of InputResultDetail We need to wait until having a response from GeckoView on how it handled the touch only after which we'll know whether to animate the toolbar or not. The edgecase scenario of having pull to refresh enabled even before having a response from GeckoView will still work because "canOverscrollTop()" only checks for the touch to not be handled by the browser to pan the page.
grigoryk
pushed a commit
to gabrielluong/android-components
that referenced
this issue
Sep 11, 2021
The previous implementation was affected by the fact that the class has 3 integer properties, all with values [0..4] (-1 was added recently) and it would just add those value to compute the hashcode. Collisions were a given. By using decimal places for each property the new implementation should avoid collisions while allowing for all the other expected guarantees.
grigoryk
pushed a commit
to gabrielluong/android-components
that referenced
this issue
Sep 11, 2021
This commented method seems to be a leftover from the previous refactoring. "behavior.forceExpand(..)" now calls "expandWithAnimation" for which we already have a test at line 450.
Verified as fixed in Fenix - mozilla-mobile/fenix#16352 (comment) |
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Issues reported on Fenix - mozilla-mobile/fenix#16352
Seems to be a race between us handling a new touch here and GV informing us about how it handled the touch here.
If we are to win it based on the default InputResultDetail we would preemptively expand the toolbar.
Seems like we need another status than
INPUT_UNHANDLED
to know that we don't yet have a status from GeckoView about how it handled the touch.I propose using a new
INPUT_HANDLING_UNKNOWN
as the default used inInputResultDetail
based on which we can avoid any updates to the toolbar until we actually getINPUT_UNHANDLED
/INPUT_HANDLED
/INPUT_HANDLED_CONTENT
.┆Issue is synchronized with this Jira Task
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: