Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Golf proofs and fix typos #21

Merged
merged 37 commits into from
May 16, 2024
Merged

Golf proofs and fix typos #21

merged 37 commits into from
May 16, 2024

Conversation

pitmonticone
Copy link
Collaborator

@pitmonticone pitmonticone commented May 8, 2024

  • Golf proof of periodicpts_is_mem
  • Golf proof of periodic_arbitrary_large_time
  • Golf proof of inter_subset_empty_of_inter_empty
  • Golf proof of separated_balls
  • Golf proof of separated_ball_image_ball
  • Golf proof of separated_balls_along_non_periodic_orbit
  • Golf proof of ball_non_periodic_arbitrary_large_time
  • Golf proof of non_periodic_arbitrary_large_time
  • Golf proof of arbitrary_large_time
  • Golf proof of is_closed
  • Golf proof of is_cpt
  • Golf proof of omegaLimit_nonempty
  • Golf proof of omegaLimit_nonwandering
  • Golf proof of nonWandering_nonempty
  • Golf proof of recurrentSet_iff_accumulation_point
  • Golf proof of periodicpts_mem_recurrentSet
  • Golf proof of recurrentSet_nonwandering
  • Golf proof of recurrentSet_of_minimal_is_all_space
  • Golf proof of minimalSubset_mem_recurrentSet

pitmonticone and others added 2 commits May 8, 2024 21:52
Co-Authored-By: Lorenzo Luccioli <71074618+lorenzoluccioli@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-Authored-By: Lorenzo Luccioli <71074618+lorenzoluccioli@users.noreply.github.com>
have hfnC : Continuous f^[n] := Continuous.iterate hf n
have hfx2' : x ≠ f^[n] x := Ne.symm hfx2
exact separated_balls (f^[n]) hfnC x hfx2'
lemma separated_ball_image_ball (n : ℕ) (hn : 0 < n) (x : α) (hfx : IsNotPeriodicPt f x) :
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is there a particular reason to avoid using have or intros?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

@pitmonticone pitmonticone May 8, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not really. It's just that in this case we could shorten the proof by removing them.

pitmonticone and others added 5 commits May 8, 2024 22:44
Co-Authored-By: Lorenzo Luccioli <71074618+lorenzoluccioli@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-Authored-By: Lorenzo Luccioli <71074618+lorenzoluccioli@users.noreply.github.com>
Update toolchain and manifest
@pitmonticone pitmonticone marked this pull request as draft May 9, 2024 20:04
pitmonticone and others added 21 commits May 9, 2024 22:18
Co-Authored-By: Lorenzo Luccioli <71074618+lorenzoluccioli@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-Authored-By: Lorenzo Luccioli <71074618+lorenzoluccioli@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-Authored-By: Lorenzo Luccioli <71074618+lorenzoluccioli@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-Authored-By: Lorenzo Luccioli <71074618+lorenzoluccioli@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-Authored-By: Lorenzo Luccioli <71074618+lorenzoluccioli@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-Authored-By: Lorenzo Luccioli <71074618+lorenzoluccioli@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-Authored-By: Lorenzo Luccioli <71074618+lorenzoluccioli@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-Authored-By: Lorenzo Luccioli <71074618+lorenzoluccioli@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-Authored-By: Lorenzo Luccioli <71074618+lorenzoluccioli@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-Authored-By: Lorenzo Luccioli <71074618+lorenzoluccioli@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-Authored-By: Lorenzo Luccioli <71074618+lorenzoluccioli@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-Authored-By: Lorenzo Luccioli <71074618+lorenzoluccioli@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-Authored-By: Lorenzo Luccioli <71074618+lorenzoluccioli@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-Authored-By: Lorenzo Luccioli <71074618+lorenzoluccioli@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-Authored-By: Lorenzo Luccioli <71074618+lorenzoluccioli@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-Authored-By: Lorenzo Luccioli <71074618+lorenzoluccioli@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-Authored-By: Lorenzo Luccioli <71074618+lorenzoluccioli@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-Authored-By: Lorenzo Luccioli <71074618+lorenzoluccioli@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-Authored-By: Lorenzo Luccioli <71074618+lorenzoluccioli@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-Authored-By: Lorenzo Luccioli <71074618+lorenzoluccioli@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-Authored-By: Lorenzo Luccioli <71074618+lorenzoluccioli@users.noreply.github.com>
pitmonticone and others added 3 commits May 10, 2024 01:10
Co-Authored-By: Lorenzo Luccioli <71074618+lorenzoluccioli@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-Authored-By: Lorenzo Luccioli <71074618+lorenzoluccioli@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-Authored-By: Lorenzo Luccioli <71074618+lorenzoluccioli@users.noreply.github.com>
@pitmonticone pitmonticone marked this pull request as ready for review May 9, 2024 23:37
Co-Authored-By: Lorenzo Luccioli <71074618+lorenzoluccioli@users.noreply.github.com>
BET/Topological.lean Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
BET/Topological.lean Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
BET/Topological.lean Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
BET/Topological.lean Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
BET/Topological.lean Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pitmonticone and others added 5 commits May 14, 2024 22:21
Co-authored-by: Marcello Seri <mseri@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Marcello Seri <mseri@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Marcello Seri <mseri@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Marcello Seri <mseri@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Marcello Seri <mseri@users.noreply.github.com>
@mseri
Copy link
Owner

mseri commented May 16, 2024

Thanks for the PR! We looked at it with @oliver-butterley and we think it is time to merge :)

@mseri mseri merged commit f06dc4e into mseri:main May 16, 2024
1 check passed
@oliver-butterley
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks @pitmonticone and @LorenzoLuccioli!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants