Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

use reflectutils.TypeName() for versioned type names #58

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 2, 2023
Merged

Conversation

muir
Copy link
Owner

@muir muir commented Feb 2, 2023

No description provided.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Base: 83.98% // Head: 83.87% // Decreases project coverage by -0.12% ⚠️

Coverage data is based on head (5760fb6) compared to base (bfb9833).
Patch coverage: 100.00% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

📣 This organization is not using Codecov’s GitHub App Integration. We recommend you install it so Codecov can continue to function properly for your repositories. Learn more

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #58      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   83.98%   83.87%   -0.12%     
==========================================
  Files          21       21              
  Lines        3023     3014       -9     
==========================================
- Hits         2539     2528      -11     
- Misses        314      316       +2     
  Partials      170      170              
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
error.go 90.62% <100.00%> (ø)
type_codes.go 95.65% <100.00%> (+1.10%) ⬆️
bind.go 86.72% <0.00%> (-1.25%) ⬇️
debug.go 88.68% <0.00%> (-1.10%) ⬇️
generate.go 64.72% <0.00%> (+1.16%) ⬆️

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@muir muir merged commit 9573d0d into main Feb 2, 2023
@muir muir deleted the typenames2 branch February 2, 2023 06:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants