Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: encoder WriteSeeker now relative to current offset #390

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 1, 2024

Conversation

muktihari
Copy link
Owner

I just remember that we can seek from current offset, this way we ensure that we will write in our own data as we write relative to the current offset.

@muktihari muktihari added the bug Something isn't working label Sep 1, 2024
@muktihari muktihari self-assigned this Sep 1, 2024
@muktihari muktihari added this to the v0.21.3 milestone Sep 1, 2024
@muktihari muktihari changed the title fix: encoder WriteSeeker's Seek now relative to SeekCurrent fix: encoder WriteSeeker now relative to current offset Sep 1, 2024
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (7bdf0df) to head (8d26c7b).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##            master      #390   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           41        41           
  Lines         3689      3691    +2     
=========================================
+ Hits          3689      3691    +2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@muktihari muktihari merged commit 2cbe865 into master Sep 1, 2024
4 checks passed
@muktihari muktihari deleted the fix/encoder-seek-current-relative branch September 1, 2024 06:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants