-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 111
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[ISSUE #1006]🎨Fix code style #1007
Conversation
🚀Thanks for your contribution🎉. CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first🔥 |
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request focus on enhancing error handling across multiple components of the RocketMQ project. Key modifications include improved error formatting in the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1007 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 19.95% 19.93% -0.03%
==========================================
Files 413 413
Lines 34440 34440
==========================================
- Hits 6874 6867 -7
- Misses 27566 27573 +7 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
🚀Thanks for your contribution🎉. CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first🔥 |
🚀Thanks for your contribution🎉. CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first🔥 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
rocketmq-namesrv/src/bin/namesrv_bootstrap_server.rs (2)
30-30
: Approve the lint suppression, but consider a more specific approach.The addition of
#[allow(clippy::needless_return)]
is acceptable as it likely addresses a false positive warning due to the#[rocketmq::main]
attribute. However, consider the following suggestions:
Use a more specific attribute:
#[allow(clippy::needless_return)]
applies to the entire function. If the warning is only for the finalOk(())
, you could use#[allow(clippy::needless_return)]
just for that line instead.Add a comment explaining why this lint is suppressed. This helps future maintainers understand the reasoning behind this decision.
Example:
#[rocketmq::main] // Suppress false positive from Clippy due to #[rocketmq::main] attribute #[allow(clippy::needless_return)] async fn main() -> anyhow::Result<()> { // ... function body ... Ok(()) // This return is necessary due to the function signature }
Line range hint
31-50
: Consider improving error handling for theboot()
method.The
main
function is well-structured and follows good practices. However, there's an opportunity to improve error handling for theboot()
method. Currently, ifboot()
fails, the error is silently ignored. Consider propagating any errors fromboot()
to ensure robust error handling.Here's a suggested improvement:
#[rocketmq::main] #[allow(clippy::needless_return)] async fn main() -> anyhow::Result<()> { // ... existing code ... Builder::new() .set_name_server_config(namesrv_config) .set_server_config(ServerConfig { listen_port: args.port, bind_address: args.ip, }) .build() .boot() .await?; // Add ? to propagate any errors Ok(()) }This change ensures that any errors occurring during the boot process are properly handled and reported.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- rocketmq-broker/src/bin/broker_bootstrap_server.rs (1 hunks)
- rocketmq-cli/src/command_line.rs (0 hunks)
- rocketmq-namesrv/src/bin/namesrv_bootstrap_server.rs (1 hunks)
💤 Files not reviewed due to no reviewable changes (1)
- rocketmq-cli/src/command_line.rs
🔇 Additional comments (1)
rocketmq-broker/src/bin/broker_bootstrap_server.rs (1)
31-31
: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionConsider the implications of suppressing the
needless_return
lint.The added attribute
#[allow(clippy::needless_return)]
suppresses warnings about unnecessaryreturn
statements in themain
function. While this reduces compiler noise, it's worth considering the following points:
- This attribute hides a style recommendation that could potentially improve code conciseness.
- The explicit
return Ok(())
at the end ofmain
is a common Rust idiom and can be considered more readable, justifying the use of this attribute.To ensure code quality and consistency:
- Verify if this approach aligns with the project's coding standards.
- Check if similar functions in the project use this attribute or follow a different style.
Alternatively, consider modifying the code to remove the explicit return:
#[rocketmq::main] async fn main() -> anyhow::Result<()> { // ... (existing code) ... Builder::new() .set_broker_config(broker_config) .set_message_store_config(message_store_config) .build() .boot() .await; Ok(()) }This change would eliminate the need for the attribute while maintaining the function's behavior. However, the current approach with the attribute is also valid if it aligns with the project's preferences for explicit returns.
Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)
Fixes #1006
Brief Description
How Did You Test This Change?
Summary by CodeRabbit