[ISSUE #1154]🚀Optimize RemotingCommand method🎨 #1155

mxsm · 2024-11-13T16:04:29Z

(cherry picked from commit fcf1ab44529434b00b6ff810a1d78ff07e1033c4)

Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)

Fixes #1154

Brief Description

How Did You Test This Change?

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

New Features
- Enhanced clarity in response messages across various processors by simplifying remark handling.
Bug Fixes
- Improved error message clarity in response commands for various operations, ensuring direct string usage instead of unnecessary wrapping.
Documentation
- Updated method signatures and descriptions to reflect changes in remark handling across multiple components.

These updates enhance the overall user experience by providing clearer and more concise error messages and responses.

(cherry picked from commit fcf1ab44529434b00b6ff810a1d78ff07e1033c4)

coderabbitai · 2024-11-13T16:04:35Z

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces multiple changes across various files in the RocketMQ codebase, primarily focusing on simplifying the handling of remarks in response commands. The modifications involve removing unnecessary Some wrappers around string messages, thereby streamlining error handling and improving code clarity. This adjustment is consistent across different processors, including those for consumer management, message processing, and request handling, while maintaining the existing control flow and functionality.

Changes

File Path	Change Summary
`rocketmq-broker/src/processor/admin_broker_processor/consumer_request_handler.rs`	Removed `Some` wrappers in `set_remark` for `get_consumer_connection_list` and `get_all_consumer_offset`.
`rocketmq-broker/src/processor/admin_broker_processor/offset_request_handler.rs`	Simplified `set_remark` in `handle_get_min_offset_for_static_topic` and `rewrite_request_for_static_topic`.
`rocketmq-broker/src/processor/admin_broker_processor/topic_request_handler.rs`	Updated `set_remark` in topic-related methods to remove `Some` wrappers.
`rocketmq-broker/src/processor/consumer_manage_processor.rs`	Simplified remark handling across multiple methods by removing `Some` wrappers.
`rocketmq-broker/src/processor/default_pull_message_result_handler.rs`	Updated `compose_response_header` to remove `Some` wrapper around remarks.
`rocketmq-broker/src/processor/end_transaction_processor.rs`	Changed `set_remark` to `set_remark_option` and simplified remark handling.
`rocketmq-broker/src/processor/pull_message_processor.rs`	Streamlined remark handling in `process_request_inner` by removing `Some` wrappers.
`rocketmq-broker/src/processor/query_message_processor.rs`	Simplified remark handling in `query_message` and `view_message_by_id` methods.
`rocketmq-broker/src/processor/reply_message_processor.rs`	Removed `Some` wrappers in `process_reply_message_request` and `handle_push_reply_result`.
`rocketmq-broker/src/processor/send_message_processor.rs`	Simplified remark handling in `send_batch_message` and `send_message` methods.
`rocketmq-client/src/implementation/client_remoting_processor.rs`	Updated `receive_reply_message` to use direct string arguments in `set_remark`.
`rocketmq-client/src/implementation/mq_client_api_impl.rs`	Changed `end_transaction_oneway` to remove `Some` wrapper around `remark`.
`rocketmq-namesrv/src/processor/client_request_processor.rs`	Simplified remarks in `get_route_info_by_topic` method by removing `Some` wrappers.
`rocketmq-namesrv/src/processor/default_request_processor.rs`	Updated multiple methods to remove `Some` wrappers for remarks.
`rocketmq-remoting/src/clients/client.rs`	Changed error handling in `run_recv` and `send` methods for clarity.
`rocketmq-remoting/src/codec/remoting_command_codec.rs`	Updated encoding methods to use `set_remark_option`.
`rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/remoting_command.rs`	Modified `create_response_command_with_code_remark` and added new remark handling methods.
`rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/rocketmq_serializable.rs`	Changed return statement in `rocket_mq_protocol_decode` to use `set_remark_option`.
`rocketmq-remoting/src/rpc/rpc_client_utils.rs`	Simplified remark handling in `create_command_for_rpc_response`.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Client
    participant Broker
    participant Namesrv
    Client->>Broker: Send request
    Broker->>Broker: Process request
    Broker->>Broker: Set remark
    Broker->>Client: Send response with remark

Assessment against linked issues

Objective	Addressed	Explanation
Optimize remark handling in `RemotingCommand` (1154)	✅

Possibly related PRs

[ISSUE #676]♻️Refactor RemotingCommand struct🚀 #677: Simplifies handling of response bodies, similar to changes in this PR.
[ISSUE #811]🎨Refactor Client error handle🔥 #812: Focuses on removing unnecessary Some() wrappers in response handling.
[ISSUE #966]🚀Support client consumer message-3🚀 #968: Related to error handling and response formatting improvements.
[ISSUE #1004]🚀optimize and improve consume logic⚡️ #1008: Optimizes consume logic, aligning with overall improvements in response handling.
[ISSUE #1089]🔥Optimize api according to rust api-guidelines🎨 #1090: Optimizes API handling, resonating with the clarity improvements in this PR.
[ISSUE #1154]🚀Optimize RemotingCommand method🎨 #1155: Enhances error handling and remark processing in the ConsumerRequestHandler.

Suggested reviewers

TeslaRustor
SpaceXCN

Poem

🐇 In the code where rabbits play,
Remarks now shine in a clearer way.
No more wrappers to hide the light,
Simplicity brings joy, oh what a sight!
With each change, our code will grow,
Hopping forward, watch us flow! 🌟

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@mxsm has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 8 minutes and 44 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1810fad and 8d4fb4a.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
- Generate unit testing code for this file.
- Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
- @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

@coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
@coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
@coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
@coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
@coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
@coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
@coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
@coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

mxsm · 2024-11-13T16:04:42Z

🚀Thanks for your contribution🎉. CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first🔥

mxsm · 2024-11-13T16:07:00Z

🚀Thanks for your contribution🎉. CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first🔥

mxsm · 2024-11-13T16:09:04Z

🚀Thanks for your contribution🎉. CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first🔥

codecov · 2024-11-13T16:11:08Z

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 3.14465% with 154 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 16.39%. Comparing base (1810fad) to head (8d4fb4a).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...tmq-broker/src/processor/pull_message_processor.rs	0.00%	31 Missing ⚠️
...tmq-broker/src/processor/send_message_processor.rs	0.00%	31 Missing ⚠️
...-broker/src/processor/end_transaction_processor.rs	0.00%	21 Missing ⚠️
...or/admin_broker_processor/topic_request_handler.rs	0.00%	14 Missing ⚠️
...namesrv/src/processor/default_request_processor.rs	0.00%	12 Missing ⚠️
...-broker/src/processor/consumer_manage_processor.rs	0.00%	10 Missing ⚠️
...r/admin_broker_processor/offset_request_handler.rs	0.00%	8 Missing ⚠️
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/remoting_command.rs	27.27%	8 Missing ⚠️
...admin_broker_processor/consumer_request_handler.rs	0.00%	3 Missing ⚠️
...mq-broker/src/processor/query_message_processor.rs	0.00%	3 Missing ⚠️
... and 8 more

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1155   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   16.39%   16.39%           
=======================================
  Files         427      427           
  Lines       52591    52571   -20     
=======================================
- Hits         8620     8617    -3     
+ Misses      43971    43954   -17

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[ISSUE #1154]🚀Optimize RemotingCommand method🎨

da7162f

(cherry picked from commit fcf1ab44529434b00b6ff810a1d78ff07e1033c4)

github-actions bot requested review from SpaceXCN and TeslaRustor November 13, 2024 16:04

mxsm added auto merge ready to review labels Nov 13, 2024

optimize code

5a00760

optimize code

8d4fb4a

SpaceXCN approved these changes Nov 13, 2024

View reviewed changes

SpaceXCN added approved PR has approved and removed ready to review labels Nov 13, 2024

mxsm merged commit a2d15d2 into main Nov 13, 2024
15 of 16 checks passed

mxsm deleted the op-1154 branch November 13, 2024 16:12

coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Dec 2, 2024

[ISSUE #1495]🚀Optimize RemotingSerializable methods return type🔥 #1517

Merged

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

[ISSUE #1154]🚀Optimize RemotingCommand method🎨 #1155

[ISSUE #1154]🚀Optimize RemotingCommand method🎨 #1155

mxsm commented Nov 13, 2024 •

edited by coderabbitai bot

Loading

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 13, 2024 •

edited

Loading

Review failed

Rate limit exceeded

Chat

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

Other keywords and placeholders

Documentation and Community

mxsm commented Nov 13, 2024

mxsm commented Nov 13, 2024

mxsm commented Nov 13, 2024

codecov bot commented Nov 13, 2024 •

edited

Loading

[ISSUE #1154]🚀Optimize RemotingCommand method🎨 #1155

[ISSUE #1154]🚀Optimize RemotingCommand method🎨 #1155

Conversation

mxsm commented Nov 13, 2024 • edited by coderabbitai bot Loading

Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)

Brief Description

How Did You Test This Change?

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 13, 2024 • edited Loading

Review failed

Walkthrough

Changes

Sequence Diagram(s)

Assessment against linked issues

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

Poem

Rate limit exceeded

Chat

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

Other keywords and placeholders

Documentation and Community

mxsm commented Nov 13, 2024

mxsm commented Nov 13, 2024

mxsm commented Nov 13, 2024

codecov bot commented Nov 13, 2024 • edited Loading

Codecov Report

mxsm commented Nov 13, 2024 •

edited by coderabbitai bot

Loading

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 13, 2024 •

edited

Loading

codecov bot commented Nov 13, 2024 •

edited

Loading