Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ISSUE #1507]♻️Refactor BrokerHeartbeatRequestHeader with derive marco RequestHeaderCodec #1589

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 5, 2024

Conversation

Happy-debug-lang
Copy link
Contributor

@Happy-debug-lang Happy-debug-lang commented Dec 5, 2024

Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)

Fixes #1507

Brief Description

How Did You Test This Change?

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new BrokerHeartbeatRequestHeader structure with enhanced serialization capabilities.
    • Added mandatory field requirements for cluster_name, broker_addr, and broker_name.
  • Tests

    • Implemented a new test module with unit tests to validate the behavior of the BrokerHeartbeatRequestHeader under various scenarios.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 5, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve a complete refactor of the BrokerHeartbeatRequestHeader struct located in rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/header/broker/broker_heartbeat_request_header.rs. The new implementation utilizes the RequestHeaderCodec derive macro, enhancing serialization and deserialization capabilities. Mandatory fields are now marked with the #[required] attribute, and the previous constructor and trait implementations have been removed. Additionally, a new test module has been added to validate the behavior of the struct under various scenarios.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/header/broker/broker_heartbeat_request_header.rs Complete overhaul of BrokerHeartbeatRequestHeader struct, added RequestHeaderCodec derive macro, and introduced unit tests.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Refactor BrokerHeartbeatRequestHeader with derive macro RequestHeaderCodec (#1507)

Possibly related issues

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

refactor, auto merge, ready to review, waiting-review, AI review first

Suggested reviewers

  • SpaceXCN
  • TeslaRustor

🐰 "In the fields where the code does play,
A struct was changed in a clever way.
With macros to ease the burden of toil,
Now tests abound, and bugs will recoil.
Hooray for the refactor, so neat and so bright,
In the world of code, we hop with delight!" 🐇


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@rocketmq-rust-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

🔊@Happy-debug-lang 🚀Thanks for your contribution 🎉. CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first 🔥

@RocketmqRustBot RocketmqRustBot added this to the v0.4.0 milestone Dec 5, 2024
@RocketmqRustBot RocketmqRustBot added the refactor♻️ refactor code label Dec 5, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 5, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 98.88889% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 25.46%. Comparing base (fa1050c) to head (1b0556b).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...l/header/broker/broker_heartbeat_request_header.rs 98.88% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1589      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   25.32%   25.46%   +0.14%     
==========================================
  Files         459      459              
  Lines       60342    60352      +10     
==========================================
+ Hits        15282    15371      +89     
+ Misses      45060    44981      -79     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/header/broker/broker_heartbeat_request_header.rs (1)

55-157: Add tests for serialization and deserialization

The current tests verify the initialization of BrokerHeartbeatRequestHeader but do not test its serialization and deserialization behaviors. Consider adding unit tests to ensure that the struct correctly serializes to and deserializes from the expected formats, particularly enforcing the presence of required fields during deserialization.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between fa1050c and 1b0556b.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/header/broker/broker_heartbeat_request_header.rs (1 hunks)

Comment on lines +110 to +131
fn broker_heartbeat_request_header_with_empty_values() {
let header = BrokerHeartbeatRequestHeader {
cluster_name: CheetahString::from(""),
broker_addr: CheetahString::from(""),
broker_name: CheetahString::from(""),
broker_id: None,
epoch: None,
max_offset: None,
confirm_offset: None,
heartbeat_timeout_mills: None,
election_priority: None,
};
assert_eq!(header.cluster_name, CheetahString::from(""));
assert_eq!(header.broker_addr, CheetahString::from(""));
assert_eq!(header.broker_name, CheetahString::from(""));
assert!(header.broker_id.is_none());
assert!(header.epoch.is_none());
assert!(header.max_offset.is_none());
assert!(header.confirm_offset.is_none());
assert!(header.heartbeat_timeout_mills.is_none());
assert!(header.election_priority.is_none());
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Validate that required fields are not empty

In the test broker_heartbeat_request_header_with_empty_values, the required fields cluster_name, broker_addr, and broker_name are initialized with empty strings. If empty strings are invalid for these required fields, consider adding validation to ensure these fields are not empty.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
AI review first Ai review pr first approved PR has approved auto merge refactor♻️ refactor code
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Refactor♻️]Refactor BrokerHeartbeatRequestHeader with derive marco RequestHeaderCodec
4 participants