Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ISSUE #1721]⚡️Optimize EscapeBridge struct logic #1722

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 12, 2024

Conversation

mxsm
Copy link
Owner

@mxsm mxsm commented Dec 12, 2024

Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)

Fixes #1721

Brief Description

How Did You Test This Change?

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced error handling for message sending processes.
    • Improved logging for error cases and message processing results.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Addressed issues with message routing and broker location handling.
  • Documentation

    • Updated method signatures for clarity on return types and error handling.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 12, 2024

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@rocketmq-rust-bot has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 7 minutes and 10 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1aa60f8 and 996e256.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • rocketmq-broker/src/failover/escape_bridge.rs (11 hunks)

Walkthrough

The changes made in this pull request enhance the error handling capabilities of the EscapeBridge struct within the escape_bridge.rs file. The put_message, put_message_to_remote_broker, and put_message_to_specific_queue methods have been updated to include structured error handling using match statements. The return types of these methods have also been modified to provide more informative results, improving overall robustness and clarity in logging error situations.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
rocketmq-broker/src/failover/escape_bridge.rs Updated put_message, put_message_to_remote_broker, and put_message_to_specific_queue methods for enhanced error handling and changed their return types.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Optimize EscapeBridge struct logic (#1721)

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

ready to review, waiting-review

Suggested reviewers

  • TeslaRustor
  • SpaceXCN

Poem

In the code where errors creep,
We’ve added checks, our promises to keep.
With logs that shine and results that tell,
The EscapeBridge now handles all quite well!
So hop along, dear code, take flight,
With robust paths, we code through the night! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Experiment)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@rocketmq-rust-robot rocketmq-rust-robot added the enhancement⚡️ New feature or request label Dec 12, 2024
@rocketmq-rust-robot rocketmq-rust-robot added this to the v0.4.0 milestone Dec 12, 2024
@rocketmq-rust-robot rocketmq-rust-robot added the wip Work In Process label Dec 12, 2024
@rocketmq-rust-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

🔊@mxsm 🚀Thanks for your contribution 🎉. CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first 🔥

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 12, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 35 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 27.84%. Comparing base (1aa60f8) to head (996e256).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
rocketmq-broker/src/failover/escape_bridge.rs 0.00% 35 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1722      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   27.85%   27.84%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         463      463              
  Lines       63857    63872      +15     
==========================================
  Hits        17787    17787              
- Misses      46070    46085      +15     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot merged commit 0e6e26d into main Dec 12, 2024
20 of 23 checks passed
@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot added approved PR has approved and removed ready to review waiting-review waiting review this PR labels Dec 12, 2024
@mxsm mxsm deleted the op-1721 branch December 13, 2024 03:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
AI review first Ai review pr first approved PR has approved auto merge enhancement⚡️ New feature or request wip Work In Process
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Enhancement⚡️] Optimize EscapeBridge struct logic
4 participants