[ISSUE #1910]🚨Add clone derive for PopMessageRequestHeader struct🚀

[mxsm]

Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)

Fixes #1910

Brief Description

How Did You Test This Change?

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features
  • Enhanced the PopMessageRequestHeader struct to support cloning, improving usability in various contexts.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces a minor enhancement to the PopMessageRequestHeader struct in the RocketMQ remoting protocol by adding the Clone trait to its derive attributes. This modification allows instances of the struct to be cloned, which can be useful in scenarios requiring duplication of the request header. The change is straightforward and does not alter the struct's existing functionality or implementation.

Changes

File	Change Summary
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/header/pop_message_request_header.rs	Added Clone trait to derive attributes for PopMessageRequestHeader struct

Assessment against linked issues

Objective	Addressed	Explanation
Add Clone derive for PopMessageRequestHeader struct [#1910]	✅

Possibly related PRs

• [ISSUE #1496]♻️Refactor SendMessageRequestHeader with RequestHeaderCodec derive macro #1497: Modification of SendMessageRequestHeader struct to include RequestHeaderCodec trait
• [ISSUE #1577]🍻Replace ConsumeMessageDirectlyResultRequestHeader and ResetOffsetRequestHeader's RpcRequestHeader with TopicRequestHeader #1578: Structural updates to request header structs

Suggested labels

refactor, enhancement, auto merge, ready to review, waiting-review, AI review first

Suggested reviewers

• TeslaRustor
• SpaceXCN

Poem

🐰 A rabbit's clone, oh so neat!
In RocketMQ's code, a tiny feat
With #[derive(Clone)] so bright
Our struct can now duplicate with might
A small change that brings such delight! 🚀

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[rocketmq-rust-bot]

🔊@mxsm 🚀Thanks for your contribution🎉！

💡CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first🔥！

Note

🚨The code review suggestions from CodeRabbit are to be used as a reference only, and the PR submitter can decide whether to make changes based on their own judgment. Ultimately, the project management personnel will conduct the final code review💥.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)

rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/header/pop_message_request_header.rs (2)

27-27: LGTM! Consider adding clone-specific tests.

The addition of Clone derive is correct as all field types implement the Clone trait. However, consider adding tests to verify cloning behavior, especially for populated instances.

Add a test like this:

#[test]
fn test_pop_message_request_header_clone() {
    let original = PopMessageRequestHeader {
        consumer_group: CheetahString::from("group1"),
        topic: CheetahString::from("topic1"),
        queue_id: 1,
        max_msg_nums: 10,
        invisible_time: 1000,
        poll_time: 2000,
        born_time: 3000,
        init_mode: 1,
        exp_type: Some(CheetahString::from("type1")),
        exp: Some(CheetahString::from("exp1")),
        order: Some(true),
        attempt_id: Some(CheetahString::from("attempt1")),
        topic_request_header: None,
    };
    
    let cloned = original.clone();
    assert_eq!(format!("{}", original), format!("{}", cloned));
}

---

27-27: Note about performance implications.

While adding Clone is correct, be mindful that cloning PopMessageRequestHeader instances with large CheetahString contents could have memory allocation overhead. Consider passing references when possible if this struct is used in performance-critical paths.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9422d43 and d465b30.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/header/pop_message_request_header.rs (1 hunks)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 28.46%. Comparing base (9422d43) to head (d465b30).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
.../src/protocol/header/pop_message_request_header.rs	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1911   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   28.46%   28.46%           
=======================================
  Files         478      478           
  Lines       67372    67372           
=======================================
  Hits        19175    19175           
  Misses      48197    48197           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.