[ISSUE #1382]💫Add HAClientRuntimeInfo for rust🚀 #2084
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces a new module Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
rocketmq-rust-bot
requested review from
rocketmq-rust-bot,
SpaceXCN and
TeslaRustor
|
🔊@mxsm 🚀Thanks for your contribution🎉！ 💡CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first🔥！ Note 🚨The code review suggestions from CodeRabbit are to be used as a reference only, and the PR submitter can decide whether to make changes based on their own judgment. Ultimately, the project management personnel will conduct the final code review💥. |
rocketmq-rust-bot
added
AI review first
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/body/ha_runtime_info.rs (1)
23-31: Consider using an unsigned type forin_sync_slave_nums.Since
in_sync_slave_numsrepresents a count of items (slaves), it may be more naturally expressed using an unsigned integer type (e.g.,u32) rather thani32. While this is not strictly incorrect, using an unsigned type can help prevent potential negative values that are logically invalid.- pub in_sync_slave_nums: i32, + pub in_sync_slave_nums: u32,
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/body.rs(1 hunks)rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/body/ha_runtime_info.rs(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/body.rs (1)
38-38: Module addition looks good.Adding
ha_runtime_infoas a public module is straightforward and fits well with the rest of the code organization. No concerns here.rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/body/ha_runtime_info.rs (1)
33-111: Great test coverage with well-structured scenarios.The unit tests cover:
- Initialization with custom values
- Default values check
- Debug formatting
This is a solid approach that provides confidence in the new functionality. Including additional tests for boundary conditions (e.g., extremely large offsets, zero or very high
in_sync_slave_nums) could further broaden coverage, but this is optional.
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2084 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 28.46% 28.53% +0.07%
==========================================
Files 491 492 +1
Lines 69644 69713 +69
==========================================
+ Hits 19825 19894 +69
Misses 49819 49819 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
rocketmq-rust-bot
added
approved
Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)
Fixes #1382
Brief Description
How Did You Test This Change?
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
HARuntimeInfostruct to capture system state and connection detailsTests
HARuntimeInfostruct initialization and functionality