Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ISSUE #2211]🚨Implement DefaultMappedFile get_last_modified_timestamp and slice_byte_buffer🍻 #2212

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 11, 2025

Conversation

mxsm
Copy link
Owner

@mxsm mxsm commented Jan 11, 2025

Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)

Fixes #2211

Brief Description

How Did You Test This Change?

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Type Safety Improvements

    • Updated multiple methods and fields to use unsigned integer types for timestamps and positions
    • Converted timestamp-related methods from signed to unsigned integer return types
    • Modified buffer access methods to improve type safety and consistency
  • Performance Optimizations

    • Simplified type conversions in timestamp handling
    • Refined method signatures for more precise data representation

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 11, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces type-related changes across multiple files in the RocketMQ store module, primarily focusing on converting integer types from signed (i64, i32) to unsigned (u64, usize). These modifications affect timestamp handling, position tracking, and byte buffer management in the MappedFile trait and DefaultMappedFile implementation. The changes aim to improve type safety and prevent potential issues with negative values in file-related operations.

Changes

File Change Summary
rocketmq-store/src/consume_queue/mapped_file_queue.rs Removed explicit casting of tmp_time_stamp to u64 in flush method
rocketmq-store/src/log_file/mapped_file.rs Updated multiple method signatures to use unsigned types for timestamps, positions, and buffer access
rocketmq-store/src/log_file/mapped_file/default_mapped_file_impl.rs Changed store_timestamp from AtomicI64 to AtomicU64, updated method return types to unsigned integers

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Implement get_last_modified_timestamp [#2211]
Implement slice_byte_buffer [#2211]

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

feature🚀, auto merge, ready to review, waiting-review, AI review first

Suggested reviewers

  • TeslaRustor
  • SpaceXCN
  • rocketmq-rust-bot

Poem

🐰 In the realm of bits and bytes so bright,
Unsigned types take their flight!
From signed to u64 we leap,
Type safety's promise we shall keep.
A rabbit's code, now clean and tight! 🚀


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@RocketmqRustBot RocketmqRustBot added this to the v0.4.0 milestone Jan 11, 2025
@rocketmq-rust-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

🔊@mxsm 🚀Thanks for your contribution🎉!

💡CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first🔥!

Note

🚨The code review suggestions from CodeRabbit are to be used as a reference only, and the PR submitter can decide whether to make changes based on their own judgment. Ultimately, the project management personnel will conduct the final code review💥.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 11, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 17 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 28.72%. Comparing base (69c515d) to head (f12f112).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...c/log_file/mapped_file/default_mapped_file_impl.rs 0.00% 16 Missing ⚠️
...ketmq-store/src/consume_queue/mapped_file_queue.rs 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2212      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   28.73%   28.72%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         498      498              
  Lines       71102    71113      +11     
==========================================
  Hits        20430    20430              
- Misses      50672    50683      +11     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 69c515d and f12f112.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • rocketmq-store/src/consume_queue/mapped_file_queue.rs (1 hunks)
  • rocketmq-store/src/log_file/mapped_file.rs (1 hunks)
  • rocketmq-store/src/log_file/mapped_file/default_mapped_file_impl.rs (4 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (9)
  • GitHub Check: build (windows-latest, nightly)
  • GitHub Check: build (windows-latest, stable)
  • GitHub Check: build (macos-latest, nightly)
  • GitHub Check: build (macos-latest, stable)
  • GitHub Check: test
  • GitHub Check: build
  • GitHub Check: build (ubuntu-latest, nightly)
  • GitHub Check: auto-approve
  • GitHub Check: build (ubuntu-latest, stable)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
rocketmq-store/src/consume_queue/mapped_file_queue.rs (1)

409-409: LGTM! Type consistency improvement

The removal of explicit casting aligns with the broader changes to use unsigned integers for timestamps consistently across the codebase.

rocketmq-store/src/log_file/mapped_file/default_mapped_file_impl.rs (2)

72-72: LGTM! Type safety improvement

Changed store_timestamp from AtomicI64 to AtomicU64 to prevent negative timestamps and improve type safety.


534-537: Performance improvement in slice_byte_buffer

Returning a direct slice reference &[u8] instead of creating a new Bytes instance eliminates unnecessary allocation and copying.

rocketmq-store/src/log_file/mapped_file.rs (1)

380-392: LGTM! Comprehensive type safety improvements

The changes to the trait methods improve the API in several ways:

  1. slice_byte_buffer now returns &[u8] for better performance
  2. Timestamp methods now return u64 for improved type safety
  3. Consistent use of unsigned integers for all timestamp operations

These changes form a cohesive improvement to the codebase's type safety and performance.

Comment on lines +546 to +554
fn get_last_modified_timestamp(&self) -> u64 {
self.file
.metadata()
.unwrap()
.modified()
.unwrap()
.elapsed()
.unwrap()
.as_millis() as u64
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Consider improving timestamp implementation robustness

The current implementation has two potential issues:

  • Multiple unwrap() calls could cause panics if file metadata is inaccessible
  • Using elapsed() from current time may not be the most reliable approach for file timestamps

Consider using SystemTime::duration_since(UNIX_EPOCH) and proper error handling:

fn get_last_modified_timestamp(&self) -> Result<u64, std::io::Error> {
    self.file
        .metadata()?
        .modified()?
        .duration_since(std::time::UNIX_EPOCH)
        .map(|d| d.as_millis() as u64)
        .map_err(|e| std::io::Error::new(std::io::ErrorKind::Other, e))
}
🔗 Analysis chain

Verify timestamp calculation accuracy

The implementation of get_last_modified_timestamp uses elapsed() which measures time since the file was last modified. This could potentially overflow for very old files.

Run this script to check for potential timestamp overflow issues:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for files that might cause timestamp overflow

# Find files older than 5 years (157680000000 milliseconds)
find . -type f -mtime +1825 -exec stat -c "File: %n, Last modified: %y" {} \;

Length of output: 82


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for similar timestamp implementations and tests
echo "=== Similar timestamp implementations ==="
rg -B 2 -A 2 "\.modified\(\).*\.elapsed\(\)" --type rust

echo -e "\n=== Test cases for timestamp handling ==="
rg -B 2 -A 2 "get_last_modified_timestamp" --type rust test

echo -e "\n=== Error handling patterns ==="
ast-grep --pattern 'unwrap()' src/log_file/mapped_file/default_mapped_file_impl.rs

Length of output: 619


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Find the correct file path first
echo "=== Locating the file ==="
fd "default_mapped_file_impl.rs"

# Once we find it, analyze the implementation
echo -e "\n=== Similar timestamp implementations in the codebase ==="
rg -B 2 -A 2 "modified\(\)" --type rust

echo -e "\n=== Usage of get_last_modified_timestamp ==="
rg -B 2 -A 2 "get_last_modified_timestamp" --type rust

Length of output: 2341

Copy link
Collaborator

@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot merged commit 24b7fe7 into main Jan 11, 2025
24 of 26 checks passed
@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot added approved PR has approved and removed ready to review waiting-review waiting review this PR labels Jan 11, 2025
@mxsm mxsm deleted the feature-2211 branch January 11, 2025 13:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
AI review first Ai review pr first approved PR has approved auto merge feature🚀 Suggest an idea for this project.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Feature🚀] Implement DefaultMappedFile get_last_modified_timestamp and slice_byte_buffer
3 participants