Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ISSUE #2213]🚨Refactor DefaultMappedFile#get_data🍻 #2214

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 11, 2025

Conversation

mxsm
Copy link
Owner

@mxsm mxsm commented Jan 11, 2025

Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)

Fixes #2213

Brief Description

How Did You Test This Change?

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Simplified MappedFileRefactor trait by removing several methods
    • Updated method signatures to use usize and u64 types instead of i32 and i64
    • Improved data retrieval process in DefaultMappedFile by accessing memory mapping directly, enhancing performance and resource management

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 11, 2025

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The pull request focuses on refactoring the MappedFileRefactor trait in the RocketMQ store module. The changes involve removing several methods like slice_byte_buffer, get_store_timestamp, and get_last_modified_timestamp, while also updating method signatures to use usize instead of i32 for position-related methods. In the DefaultMappedFile implementation, the get_data method's internal logic has been modified to directly use the mmapped_file field and adjust the resource management flow.

Changes

File Change Summary
rocketmq-store/src/log_file/mapped_file.rs - Removed methods: slice_byte_buffer(), get_store_timestamp(), get_last_modified_timestamp(), get_data()
- Updated method signatures from i32 to usize for position-related methods
- Changed some return types from i64 to u64
rocketmq-store/src/log_file/mapped_file/default_mapped_file_impl.rs - Modified get_data() method to use self.mmapped_file.as_ref()
- Adjusted resource release order

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Refactor DefaultMappedFile#get_data [#2213]
Ensure no new bugs
Update unit tests No evidence of test updates in the diff
Performance impact Requires performance testing
Document architecture changes No documentation provided

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

ready to review, waiting-review

Suggested reviewers

  • TeslaRustor
  • SpaceXCN

Poem

🐰 Mapped files dancing light,
Methods trimmed with rabbit's might,
Bytes now flow with cleaner grace,
Refactoring leaves no trace,
Code's new rhythm takes its flight! 🚀


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a4cc6db and 83f76a0.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • rocketmq-store/src/log_file/mapped_file/default_mapped_file_impl.rs (1 hunks)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@rocketmq-rust-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

🔊@mxsm 🚀Thanks for your contribution🎉!

💡CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first🔥!

Note

🚨The code review suggestions from CodeRabbit are to be used as a reference only, and the PR submitter can decide whether to make changes based on their own judgment. Ultimately, the project management personnel will conduct the final code review💥.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 24b7fe7 and a4cc6db.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • rocketmq-store/src/log_file/mapped_file.rs (0 hunks)
  • rocketmq-store/src/log_file/mapped_file/default_mapped_file_impl.rs (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • rocketmq-store/src/log_file/mapped_file.rs
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Actions: Codecov
rocketmq-store/src/log_file/mapped_file/default_mapped_file_impl.rs

[error] 563-563: The trait From<[u8]> is not implemented for BytesMut. Consider using BytesMut::from(&[u8]) instead as BytesMut implements From<&[u8]>.


[error] 563-563: Cannot use slice with dynamic size [u8] directly in From conversion. The size for values of type [u8] cannot be known at compilation time.

🪛 GitHub Actions: CI
rocketmq-store/src/log_file/mapped_file/default_mapped_file_impl.rs

[error] 563-563: Invalid type conversion: the trait bound bytes::BytesMut: std::convert::From<[u8]> is not satisfied. BytesMut does not implement From<[u8]>.


[error] 563-563: Cannot determine size at compile time: the size for values of type [u8] cannot be known at compilation time. The trait std::marker::Sized is not implemented for [u8].

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: auto-approve

Comment on lines 563 to 564
let buffer = BytesMut::from(self.mmapped_file.as_ref()[pos..read_end_position]);
MappedFile::release(self);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Fix BytesMut initialization and verify resource management.

The current implementation has two issues:

  1. The BytesMut initialization is incorrect and fails to compile because BytesMut doesn't implement From<[u8]>.
  2. Moving MappedFile::release(self) after buffer creation could potentially lead to use-after-free if the buffer creation panics.

Fix the BytesMut initialization and restore the safe resource management:

-                let buffer = BytesMut::from(self.mmapped_file.as_ref()[pos..read_end_position]);
-                MappedFile::release(self);
+                let buffer = BytesMut::copy_from_slice(&self.mmapped_file.as_ref()[pos..read_end_position]);
+                let result = Some(buffer.freeze());
+                MappedFile::release(self);
+                result

This change:

  1. Uses copy_from_slice to properly create BytesMut from the slice
  2. Ensures release is called even if buffer creation panics
  3. Returns the result after releasing the resource

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: Codecov

[error] 563-563: The trait From<[u8]> is not implemented for BytesMut. Consider using BytesMut::from(&[u8]) instead as BytesMut implements From<&[u8]>.


[error] 563-563: Cannot use slice with dynamic size [u8] directly in From conversion. The size for values of type [u8] cannot be known at compilation time.

🪛 GitHub Actions: CI

[error] 563-563: Invalid type conversion: the trait bound bytes::BytesMut: std::convert::From<[u8]> is not satisfied. BytesMut does not implement From<[u8]>.


[error] 563-563: Cannot determine size at compile time: the size for values of type [u8] cannot be known at compilation time. The trait std::marker::Sized is not implemented for [u8].

@rocketmq-rust-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

🔊@mxsm 🚀Thanks for your contribution🎉!

💡CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first🔥!

Note

🚨The code review suggestions from CodeRabbit are to be used as a reference only, and the PR submitter can decide whether to make changes based on their own judgment. Ultimately, the project management personnel will conduct the final code review💥.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 11, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 28.72%. Comparing base (24b7fe7) to head (83f76a0).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...c/log_file/mapped_file/default_mapped_file_impl.rs 0.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2214      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   28.72%   28.72%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         498      498              
  Lines       71113    71114       +1     
==========================================
  Hits        20430    20430              
- Misses      50683    50684       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Collaborator

@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot merged commit 5fef17d into main Jan 11, 2025
15 of 17 checks passed
@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot added approved PR has approved and removed ready to review waiting-review waiting review this PR labels Jan 11, 2025
@mxsm mxsm deleted the refactor-2213 branch January 11, 2025 13:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
AI review first Ai review pr first approved PR has approved auto merge refactor♻️ refactor code
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Refactor♻️]Refactor DefaultMappedFile#get_data
3 participants