Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ISSUE #2234]⚡️Optimize BrokerRuntimeInner register_broker_all method paramters🦺 #2235

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 14, 2025

Conversation

mxsm
Copy link
Owner

@mxsm mxsm commented Jan 14, 2025

Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)

Fixes #2234

Brief Description

How Did You Test This Change?

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced broker registration configuration with dynamic timeout settings
    • Added support for compressed broker registration
    • Introduced option for slave broker acting as master configuration
  • Configuration Updates

    • Added new configuration parameters for broker registration process
    • Enabled more flexible broker timeout and registration strategies

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 14, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces enhancements to the broker registration process in RocketMQ's Rust implementation. The changes modify the BrokerConfig struct by adding two new configuration fields: compressed_register and broker_not_active_timeout_millis. Correspondingly, the do_register_broker_all method in BrokerRuntimeInner is updated to use these new configuration parameters, providing more flexibility in broker registration settings.

Changes

File Change Summary
rocketmq-common/src/common/broker/broker_config.rs Added two new public fields: compressed_register (bool) and broker_not_active_timeout_millis (i64) with default values
rocketmq-broker/src/broker_runtime.rs Updated do_register_broker_all method to use dynamic timeout and new configuration parameters

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Optimize register_broker_all method parameters [#2234]

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

enhancement⚡️, auto merge, ready to review, waiting-review, AI review first, rocketmq-broker crate

Suggested reviewers

  • TeslaRustor
  • SpaceXCN
  • rocketmq-rust-bot

Poem

🚀 Broker's dance, parameters bright,
Configurable settings take their flight,
Milliseconds tick, flags unfurl,
Registration's magic begins to swirl,
RocketMQ's Rust, a code delight! 🐰


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@rocketmq-rust-robot rocketmq-rust-robot added the enhancement⚡️ New feature or request label Jan 14, 2025
@rocketmq-rust-robot rocketmq-rust-robot added this to the v0.4.0 milestone Jan 14, 2025
@rocketmq-rust-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

🔊@mxsm 🚀Thanks for your contribution🎉!

💡CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first🔥!

Note

🚨The code review suggestions from CodeRabbit are to be used as a reference only, and the PR submitter can decide whether to make changes based on their own judgment. Ultimately, the project management personnel will conduct the final code review💥.

@mxsm mxsm changed the title [ISSUE #2234]⚡️Optimize BrokerRuntimeInner register_broker_all method… [ISSUE #2234]⚡️Optimize BrokerRuntimeInner register_broker_all method paramters🦺 Jan 14, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
rocketmq-common/src/common/broker/broker_config.rs (1)

200-201: Add documentation for the new configuration fields.

The new fields look good, but please add documentation to explain:

  • Purpose and impact of enabling compressed_register
  • Expected values and behavior for broker_not_active_timeout_millis
+    /// Whether to compress broker registration data to reduce network bandwidth usage.
     pub compressed_register: bool,
+    /// Timeout in milliseconds after which a broker is considered inactive.
+    /// Only used when `enable_slave_acting_master` is true.
     pub broker_not_active_timeout_millis: i64,
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ccd0e7c and 1a0cdbf.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • rocketmq-broker/src/broker_runtime.rs (1 hunks)
  • rocketmq-common/src/common/broker/broker_config.rs (2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (9)
  • GitHub Check: build (windows-latest, nightly)
  • GitHub Check: build (windows-latest, stable)
  • GitHub Check: build (macos-latest, nightly)
  • GitHub Check: build (macos-latest, stable)
  • GitHub Check: test
  • GitHub Check: build (ubuntu-latest, nightly)
  • GitHub Check: build (ubuntu-latest, stable)
  • GitHub Check: build
  • GitHub Check: auto-approve
🔇 Additional comments (2)
rocketmq-common/src/common/broker/broker_config.rs (1)

304-305: LGTM! Default values look reasonable.

  • compressed_register defaults to false which maintains backward compatibility
  • broker_not_active_timeout_millis defaults to 10 seconds which is a typical network timeout value
rocketmq-broker/src/broker_runtime.rs (1)

1096-1102: LGTM! Registration parameters are now properly configurable.

The changes improve the broker registration process by:

  1. Using configurable timeout from register_broker_timeout_mills
  2. Supporting compressed registration via compressed_register
  3. Conditionally setting inactive broker timeout only when slave is acting as master

Run this script to verify the integration:

✅ Verification successful

Broker registration parameters are properly integrated and used

The verification confirms that:

  • Registration timeout is properly configured and passed through
  • Compressed registration is correctly integrated
  • Inactive broker timeout is correctly applied only when slave is acting as master
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of new broker registration parameters.

# Test 1: Check if the new parameters are used consistently
rg -A 5 'register_broker_all.*compressed_register'

# Test 2: Check if the timeout is used correctly
rg -A 5 'register_broker_timeout_mills'

# Test 3: Check if the inactive timeout is used correctly
rg -A 5 'broker_not_active_timeout_millis.*enable_slave_acting_master'

Length of output: 2876


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for compressed_register configuration and usage
rg "compressed_register" -A 3

# Search for broker_not_active_timeout_millis
rg "broker_not_active_timeout_millis" -A 3

# Find the registration method implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'fn do_register_broker_all($$$) {
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 2017


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Find the registration method and its parameter usage
rg -A 10 "async fn register_broker_all" 

# Find where these parameters are used in the registration process
ast-grep --pattern 'register_broker_all($$$) -> $$ {
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 2679

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 14, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 22.22222% with 7 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 28.32%. Comparing base (ccd0e7c) to head (1a0cdbf).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
rocketmq-broker/src/broker_runtime.rs 0.00% 7 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2235   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   28.32%   28.32%           
=======================================
  Files         498      498           
  Lines       72150    72154    +4     
=======================================
+ Hits        20435    20437    +2     
- Misses      51715    51717    +2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Collaborator

@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot merged commit 9896960 into main Jan 14, 2025
29 of 30 checks passed
@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot added approved PR has approved and removed ready to review waiting-review waiting review this PR labels Jan 14, 2025
@mxsm mxsm deleted the op-2234 branch January 14, 2025 07:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
AI review first Ai review pr first approved PR has approved auto merge enhancement⚡️ New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Enhancement⚡️]Optimize BrokerRuntimeInner register_broker_all method paramters
3 participants