Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ISSUE #2247]🚀 TopicQueueMappingCleanService and BroadcastOffsetManager add shutdown method #2248

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 15, 2025

Conversation

mxsm
Copy link
Owner

@mxsm mxsm commented Jan 15, 2025

Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)

Fixes #2247

Brief Description

How Did You Test This Change?

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Added placeholder shutdown methods to BroadcastOffsetManager and TopicQueueMappingCleanService
    • Logging warning messages for unimplemented shutdown functionality

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 15, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces a shutdown method to two structs in the RocketMQ broker: BroadcastOffsetManager and TopicQueueMappingCleanService. These methods are currently placeholder implementations that log a warning message indicating that the shutdown functionality is not fully implemented. The changes aim to provide a consistent interface for shutdown operations across different components of the broker.

Changes

File Change Summary
rocketmq-broker/src/offset/manager/broadcast_offset_manager.rs Added pub fn shutdown(&mut self) method with a warning log
rocketmq-broker/src/topic/topic_queue_mapping_clean_service.rs Added pub fn shutdown(&mut self) method with a warning log

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Add shutdown method to TopicQueueMappingCleanService [#2247]
Add shutdown method to BroadcastOffsetManager [#2247]

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

enhancement⚡️, rocketmq-broker crate

Suggested reviewers

  • TeslaRustor
  • SpaceXCN

Poem

🐰 Shutdown methods hop into view,
Logging warnings, both old and new,
A placeholder dance of code so bright,
Preparing for a graceful system's flight!
Rabbit says: "Shutdown's coming soon!" 🚀


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@RocketmqRustBot RocketmqRustBot added this to the v0.4.0 milestone Jan 15, 2025
@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot self-requested a review January 15, 2025 02:45
@rocketmq-rust-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

🔊@mxsm 🚀Thanks for your contribution🎉!

💡CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first🔥!

Note

🚨The code review suggestions from CodeRabbit are to be used as a reference only, and the PR submitter can decide whether to make changes based on their own judgment. Ultimately, the project management personnel will conduct the final code review💥.

@RocketmqRustBot RocketmqRustBot added the feature🚀 Suggest an idea for this project. label Jan 15, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 15, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 6 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 28.31%. Comparing base (c19a3b9) to head (98b7dfa).
Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...ker/src/offset/manager/broadcast_offset_manager.rs 0.00% 3 Missing ⚠️
...ker/src/topic/topic_queue_mapping_clean_service.rs 0.00% 3 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2248      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   28.31%   28.31%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         498      499       +1     
  Lines       72173    72179       +6     
==========================================
  Hits        20437    20437              
- Misses      51736    51742       +6     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
rocketmq-broker/src/offset/manager/broadcast_offset_manager.rs (1)

Critical broker components depend on these unimplemented methods

The query_init_offset and update_offset methods in BroadcastOffsetManager are called by core broker components:

  • pull_message_processor.rs relies on query_init_offset
  • default_pull_message_result_handler.rs relies on update_offset

Consider implementing these methods similar to ConsumerOffsetManager, which has a complete implementation for offset management.

🔗 Analysis chain

Line range hint 20-46: Consider implementing the unimplemented methods.

The struct has multiple methods marked as unimplemented!(). This suggests the component is not fully functional. Consider implementing these methods or adding TODOs with tracking issues.

Let's check if there are any related implementations in the codebase:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for similar method implementations
ast-grep --pattern 'fn query_init_offset($$$) { $$ }'
ast-grep --pattern 'fn update_offset($$$) { $$ }'

Length of output: 107


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for trait definitions and implementations
rg "trait.*OffsetManager" -A 5
rg "impl.*OffsetManager" -A 5

# Search for similar method names
rg "query_init_offset|update_offset" -A 2

# Find all offset manager related files
fd "offset.*manager" --type f

Length of output: 8275

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c19a3b9 and 98b7dfa.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • rocketmq-broker/src/offset/manager/broadcast_offset_manager.rs (2 hunks)
  • rocketmq-broker/src/topic/topic_queue_mapping_clean_service.rs (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (8)
  • GitHub Check: build (windows-latest, nightly)
  • GitHub Check: build (windows-latest, stable)
  • GitHub Check: build (macos-latest, nightly)
  • GitHub Check: build (macos-latest, stable)
  • GitHub Check: build (ubuntu-latest, nightly)
  • GitHub Check: test
  • GitHub Check: build (ubuntu-latest, stable)
  • GitHub Check: auto-approve
🔇 Additional comments (3)
rocketmq-broker/src/topic/topic_queue_mapping_clean_service.rs (1)

18-19: LGTM!

The import of tracing::warn is appropriate for logging functionality.

rocketmq-broker/src/offset/manager/broadcast_offset_manager.rs (2)

17-18: LGTM!

The import of tracing::warn is appropriate for logging functionality.


48-50: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Align shutdown implementation with existing method patterns.

The shutdown method implementation differs from other methods in the struct which return unimplemented!(). Consider:

  1. Following the same pattern as other methods for consistency
  2. Adding proper error handling
  3. Implementing the same shutdown trait as suggested for TopicQueueMappingCleanService

Example implementation:

/// Performs cleanup and releases resources
/// 
/// # Returns
/// Result indicating success or specific shutdown error
pub fn shutdown(&mut self) -> Result<(), Box<dyn std::error::Error>> {
    // TODO: Implement actual cleanup logic
    warn!("BroadcastOffsetManager shutdown not implemented");
    Ok(())
}

Let's check if there are any other components in the codebase that implement shutdown behavior:

Comment on lines +23 to +25
pub fn shutdown(&mut self) {
warn!("TopicQueueMappingCleanService shutdown not implemented");
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider implementing Drop trait for cleanup.

The shutdown method is currently a placeholder. Consider:

  1. Adding documentation explaining the method's purpose and expected behavior
  2. Implementing the Drop trait for automatic cleanup
  3. Following Rust's standard pattern by implementing a Shutdown trait

Example implementation:

/// Trait defining shutdown behavior
pub trait Shutdown {
    fn shutdown(&mut self) -> Result<(), Box<dyn std::error::Error>>;
}

impl TopicQueueMappingCleanService {
    /// Performs cleanup and releases resources
    /// 
    /// # Returns
    /// Result indicating success or specific shutdown error
    pub fn shutdown(&mut self) -> Result<(), Box<dyn std::error::Error>> {
        // TODO: Implement actual cleanup logic
        warn!("TopicQueueMappingCleanService shutdown not implemented");
        Ok(())
    }
}

impl Drop for TopicQueueMappingCleanService {
    fn drop(&mut self) {
        if let Err(e) = self.shutdown() {
            warn!("Error during TopicQueueMappingCleanService shutdown: {}", e);
        }
    }
}

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
AI review first Ai review pr first approved PR has approved auto merge feature🚀 Suggest an idea for this project.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Feature🚀] TopicQueueMappingCleanService and BroadcastOffsetManager add shutdown method
3 participants