Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ISSUE #2279]🚀BrokerFastFailure and BrokerPreOnlineService add start method #2280

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 16, 2025

Conversation

mxsm
Copy link
Owner

@mxsm mxsm commented Jan 16, 2025

Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)

Fixes #2279

Brief Description

How Did You Test This Change?

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Added placeholder start methods for BrokerPreOnlineService and BrokerFastFailure services.
  • Chores
    • Prepared service initialization methods with logging placeholders.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 16, 2025

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces a start method to two structs in the RocketMQ Rust implementation: BrokerPreOnlineService and BrokerFastFailure. Both methods are currently placeholder implementations that log a warning message indicating the functionality is not yet implemented. This change appears to be preparing the groundwork for future service initialization logic in these components.

Changes

File Change Summary
rocketmq-broker/src/broker/broker_pre_online_service.rs Added pub fn start(&mut self) method with warning log
rocketmq-broker/src/latency/broker_fast_failure.rs Added pub fn start(&mut self) method with warning log

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Add start method to BrokerFastFailure
Add start method to BrokerPreOnlineService

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

ready to review, waiting-review

Suggested reviewers

  • TeslaRustor
  • SpaceXCN

Poem

🚀 Rabbit's Startup Song 🐰

Two services await their call,
With start methods standing tall
A warning log, a placeholder neat
Preparing for their future feat!

Code grows, one method at a time
In Rust, we build our paradigm! 🌟


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between fa6f6a0 and 20341c3.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • rocketmq-broker/src/broker/broker_pre_online_service.rs (1 hunks)
  • rocketmq-broker/src/latency/broker_fast_failure.rs (1 hunks)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@rocketmq-rust-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

🔊@mxsm 🚀Thanks for your contribution🎉!

💡CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first🔥!

Note

🚨The code review suggestions from CodeRabbit are to be used as a reference only, and the PR submitter can decide whether to make changes based on their own judgment. Ultimately, the project management personnel will conduct the final code review💥.

@RocketmqRustBot RocketmqRustBot added this to the v0.4.0 milestone Jan 16, 2025
@RocketmqRustBot RocketmqRustBot added the feature🚀 Suggest an idea for this project. label Jan 16, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 16, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 6 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 28.24%. Comparing base (1c3b29c) to head (20341c3).
Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...tmq-broker/src/broker/broker_pre_online_service.rs 0.00% 3 Missing ⚠️
rocketmq-broker/src/latency/broker_fast_failure.rs 0.00% 3 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2280      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   28.24%   28.24%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         504      504              
  Lines       72357    72369      +12     
==========================================
  Hits        20438    20438              
- Misses      51919    51931      +12     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
rocketmq-broker/src/latency/broker_fast_failure.rs (1)

22-26: Consider implementing a service trait.

Both start and shutdown methods suggest this is a service. Consider implementing a common service trait for consistent lifecycle management.

Example trait implementation:

pub trait Service {
    fn start(&mut self) -> Result<(), Error>;
    fn shutdown(&mut self) -> Result<(), Error>;
}

impl Service for BrokerFastFailure {
    fn start(&mut self) -> Result<(), Error> {
        // TODO: Implement start logic
        Ok(())
    }

    fn shutdown(&mut self) -> Result<(), Error> {
        // TODO: Implement shutdown logic
        Ok(())
    }
}
rocketmq-broker/src/broker/broker_pre_online_service.rs (1)

23-24: Consider using a more idiomatic message.

The warning message could be more idiomatic.

-        warn!("BrokerPreOnlineService started not implemented");
+        warn!("BrokerPreOnlineService::start not implemented");
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a3e692a and fa6f6a0.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • rocketmq-broker/src/broker/broker_pre_online_service.rs (1 hunks)
  • rocketmq-broker/src/latency/broker_fast_failure.rs (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Actions: CI
rocketmq-broker/src/broker/broker_pre_online_service.rs

[warning] 19-19: Formatting error: Incorrect spacing before pub fn start


[warning] 26-26: Formatting error: Incorrect spacing before pub fn shutdown

rocketmq-broker/src/latency/broker_fast_failure.rs

[warning] 19-19: Formatting error: Incorrect spacing before pub fn start

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
  • GitHub Check: test
  • GitHub Check: build
  • GitHub Check: auto-approve
🔇 Additional comments (1)
rocketmq-broker/src/broker/broker_pre_online_service.rs (1)

22-26: Maintain consistency with BrokerFastFailure.

For consistency, this service should follow the same pattern as BrokerFastFailure. Consider implementing the same service trait here.

🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: CI

[warning] 26-26: Formatting error: Incorrect spacing before pub fn shutdown

Comment on lines 22 to 25

pub fn start(&mut self) {
warn!("BrokerFastFailure started not implemented");
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Fix formatting and add documentation.

The formatting needs to be fixed according to the pipeline failure. Also, please add documentation for this public API.

Apply this diff:

-    
+
+    /// Starts the BrokerFastFailure service.
+    ///
+    /// # Note
+    /// Currently not implemented.
     pub fn start(&mut self) {
         warn!("BrokerFastFailure started not implemented");
     }
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
pub fn start(&mut self) {
warn!("BrokerFastFailure started not implemented");
}
/// Starts the BrokerFastFailure service.
///
/// # Note
/// Currently not implemented.
pub fn start(&mut self) {
warn!("BrokerFastFailure started not implemented");
}

Comment on lines 22 to 25

pub fn start(&mut self) {
warn!("BrokerPreOnlineService started not implemented");
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Fix formatting and add documentation.

The formatting needs to be fixed according to the pipeline failures. Also, please add documentation for this public API.

Apply this diff:

-
+    /// Starts the BrokerPreOnlineService service.
+    ///
+    /// # Note
+    /// Currently not implemented.
     pub fn start(&mut self) {
         warn!("BrokerPreOnlineService started not implemented");
     }
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
pub fn start(&mut self) {
warn!("BrokerPreOnlineService started not implemented");
}
/// Starts the BrokerPreOnlineService service.
///
/// # Note
/// Currently not implemented.
pub fn start(&mut self) {
warn!("BrokerPreOnlineService started not implemented");
}

@rocketmq-rust-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

🔊@mxsm 🚀Thanks for your contribution🎉!

💡CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first🔥!

Note

🚨The code review suggestions from CodeRabbit are to be used as a reference only, and the PR submitter can decide whether to make changes based on their own judgment. Ultimately, the project management personnel will conduct the final code review💥.

Copy link
Collaborator

@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot merged commit 0462cab into main Jan 16, 2025
16 of 17 checks passed
@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot added approved PR has approved and removed ready to review waiting-review waiting review this PR labels Jan 16, 2025
@mxsm mxsm deleted the feature-2279 branch January 16, 2025 03:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
AI review first Ai review pr first approved PR has approved auto merge feature🚀 Suggest an idea for this project.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Feature🚀] BrokerFastFailure and BrokerPreOnlineService add start method
3 participants