[ISSUE #2306]⚡️Remove useless set_cmd_version from RemotingCommand

[mxsm]

Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)

Fixes #2306

Brief Description

How Did You Test This Change?

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Refactor
  • Removed a method related to command version management in the remoting protocol implementation.

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@rocketmq-rust-bot has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 27 minutes and 34 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between da8e81c and 249d58b.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/remoting_command.rs (0 hunks)

Walkthrough

The pull request involves the removal of the set_cmd_version method from the RemotingCommand implementation in the RocketMQ Rust remoting protocol. This change indicates that the functionality for setting command versions is no longer encapsulated within a dedicated method. The overall structure and other methods of RemotingCommand remain unchanged.

Changes

File	Change Summary
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/remoting_command.rs	Removed pub fn set_cmd_version(self) -> Self method from RemotingCommand implementation

Assessment against linked issues

Objective	Addressed	Explanation
Remove useless set_cmd_version method [#2306]	✅

Possibly related PRs

• [ISSUE #2304]🏗️Add RemotingCommand encodeHeader method for Zero Copy🚀 #2305: Adds new methods to the RemotingCommand struct, indicating ongoing modifications to the same implementation.

Suggested labels

refactor♻️, ready to review, waiting-review

Suggested reviewers

• TeslaRustor
• SpaceXCN

Poem

🚀 A method vanished, clean and bright
In RocketMQ's Rust-powered flight
set_cmd_version took its bow
Simplicity reigns supreme now
Code refactored with rabbit's might! 🐰✨

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[rocketmq-rust-bot]

🔊@mxsm 🚀Thanks for your contribution🎉！

💡CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first🔥！

Note

🚨The code review suggestions from CodeRabbit are to be used as a reference only, and the PR submitter can decide whether to make changes based on their own judgment. Ultimately, the project management personnel will conduct the final code review💥.

[rocketmq-rust-bot]

LGTM

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 28.21%. Comparing base (da8e81c) to head (249d58b).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2307   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   28.21%   28.21%           
=======================================
  Files         504      504           
  Lines       72454    72451    -3     
=======================================
  Hits        20440    20440           
+ Misses      52014    52011    -3     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.