Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ISSUE #2319]🤡Add README.md for broker-store crate🧑‍💻 #2320

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 18, 2025

Conversation

mxsm
Copy link
Owner

@mxsm mxsm commented Jan 18, 2025

Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)

Fixes #2319

Brief Description

How Did You Test This Change?

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation

    • Updated Cargo.toml with project metadata, including keywords, README file, and description
    • Added a new section to the README explaining the purpose of the RocketMQ store module in Rust
  • Chores

    • Reformatted Windows dependency specification for improved readability

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 18, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces metadata and documentation improvements for the rocketmq-store package. The Cargo.toml file has been updated with new fields including keywords, readme specification, and a package description. A new README.md file has been created for the rocketmq-store module, providing an overview of the Rust implementation of the Apache RocketMQ store. The changes focus on enhancing project documentation and metadata without altering core functionality.

Changes

File Change Summary
rocketmq-store/Cargo.toml - Added keywords field with project-related keywords
- Added readme field pointing to README.md
- Added description field
- Reformatted windows dependency with improved spacing
rocketmq-store/README.md - Added new section "The Rust Implementation of Apache RocketMQ store"
- Added "Overview" subsection describing module's purpose

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Add README.md for broker-store crate [#2319]

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

enhancement⚡️, auto merge, ready to review, waiting-review, AI review first

Suggested reviewers

  • TeslaRustor
  • SpaceXCN
  • rocketmq-rust-bot

Poem

🚀 In the realm of RocketMQ's Rust domain,
A README springs forth, knowledge to attain
Metadata polished, keywords aligned
Documentation's rabbit, carefully designed!
Hop hop hooray, our store now shines bright! 🐰


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a117a4d and 2e557fb.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • rocketmq-store/Cargo.toml (2 hunks)
  • rocketmq-store/README.md (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • rocketmq-store/README.md
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (9)
  • GitHub Check: build (windows-latest, nightly)
  • GitHub Check: build (windows-latest, stable)
  • GitHub Check: build (macos-latest, nightly)
  • GitHub Check: test
  • GitHub Check: build (macos-latest, stable)
  • GitHub Check: build (ubuntu-latest, nightly)
  • GitHub Check: build
  • GitHub Check: auto-approve
  • GitHub Check: build (ubuntu-latest, stable)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
rocketmq-store/Cargo.toml (3)

9-11: LGTM! Well-structured package metadata.

The added metadata fields follow Rust's conventions and provide clear, relevant information about the crate. The keywords are well-chosen for discoverability, and the description accurately conveys the crate's purpose.


56-56: LGTM! Consistent formatting.

The Windows dependency specification has been reformatted with consistent spacing, improving readability while maintaining the same functionality.


Line range hint 43-43: Verify duplicate tempfile dependency.

The tempfile crate is listed in both [dependencies] and [dev-dependencies] sections. Consider moving it to just [dev-dependencies] if it's only used in tests and benchmarks.

Let's check the usage of tempfile in the codebase:

Also applies to: 60-60


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@RocketmqRustBot RocketmqRustBot added this to the v0.4.0 milestone Jan 18, 2025
@rocketmq-rust-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

🔊@mxsm 🚀Thanks for your contribution🎉!

💡CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first🔥!

Note

🚨The code review suggestions from CodeRabbit are to be used as a reference only, and the PR submitter can decide whether to make changes based on their own judgment. Ultimately, the project management personnel will conduct the final code review💥.

@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot self-requested a review January 18, 2025 02:13
@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot added the waiting-review waiting review this PR label Jan 18, 2025
@RocketmqRustBot RocketmqRustBot added the documentation📝 Improvements or additions to documentation label Jan 18, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 18, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 28.28%. Comparing base (a117a4d) to head (2e557fb).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2320   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   28.28%   28.28%           
=======================================
  Files         504      504           
  Lines       72422    72422           
=======================================
  Hits        20485    20485           
  Misses      51937    51937           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Collaborator

@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot merged commit 816cdfe into main Jan 18, 2025
25 checks passed
@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot added approved PR has approved and removed ready to review waiting-review waiting review this PR labels Jan 18, 2025
@mxsm mxsm deleted the doc-2319 branch January 18, 2025 10:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
AI review first Ai review pr first approved PR has approved auto merge documentation📝 Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Doc📝] Add README.md for broker-store crate
3 participants