[ISSUE #2321]🤡Remove useless code from PullMessageProcessor🧑‍💻

[mxsm]

Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)

Fixes #2321

Brief Description

How Did You Test This Change?

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Refactor
  • Simplified PullMessageProcessor struct by removing multiple configuration and management fields
  • Streamlined constructor method with fewer parameters
  • Reduced complexity of broker-related dependencies

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The pull request focuses on simplifying the PullMessageProcessor struct in the RocketMQ broker by removing several configuration and management-related fields. The changes reduce the complexity of the struct by eliminating unnecessary dependencies and streamlining its constructor. The core functionality remains unchanged, with the struct now maintaining only essential components like pull_message_result_handler, cold_data_cg_ctr_service, and broker_runtime_inner.

Changes

File	Change Summary
rocketmq-broker/src/processor/pull_message_processor.rs	- Removed multiple configuration and manager fields from PullMessageProcessor struct - Simplified new() method signature - Modified cold_data_cg_ctr_service initialization

Assessment against linked issues

Objective	Addressed	Explanation
Remove useless code from PullMessageProcessor [#2321]	✅

Possibly related PRs

• [ISSUE #2298]⚡️Remove PopMessageProcessor useless code #2299: Similar field removal in PopMessageProcessor struct
• [ISSUE #2302]⚡️Optimize PopMessageProcessor#process_request #2303: Simplification of processor method logic
• [ISSUE #2223]💫Remove BrokerRuntime unused code and enhancement code🧑‍💻 #2224: Handling of optional fields in BrokerRuntimeInner

Suggested labels

enhancement⚡️, auto merge, ready to review, waiting-review, AI review first, rocketmq-broker crate

Suggested reviewers

• TeslaRustor
• SpaceXCN
• rocketmq-rust-bot

Poem

🚀 In the realm of RocketMQ's code,
A processor's burden now unloaded,
Fields stripped away with gentle care,
Simplicity blooms everywhere,
A leaner struct, now swift and light! 🐰

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 816cdfe and 9381416.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• rocketmq-broker/src/processor/pull_message_processor.rs (0 hunks)

💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)

• rocketmq-broker/src/processor/pull_message_processor.rs

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (9)

• GitHub Check: build (windows-latest, nightly)
• GitHub Check: build (windows-latest, stable)
• GitHub Check: build (macos-latest, nightly)
• GitHub Check: build (macos-latest, stable)
• GitHub Check: build (ubuntu-latest, nightly)
• GitHub Check: test
• GitHub Check: build
• GitHub Check: auto-approve
• GitHub Check: build (ubuntu-latest, stable)

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[rocketmq-rust-bot]

🔊@mxsm 🚀Thanks for your contribution🎉！

💡CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first🔥！

Note

🚨The code review suggestions from CodeRabbit are to be used as a reference only, and the PR submitter can decide whether to make changes based on their own judgment. Ultimately, the project management personnel will conduct the final code review💥.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 28.29%. Comparing base (816cdfe) to head (9381416).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2322   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   28.28%   28.29%           
=======================================
  Files         504      504           
  Lines       72422    72401   -21     
=======================================
  Hits        20485    20485           
+ Misses      51937    51916   -21     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[rocketmq-rust-bot]

LGTM