Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): update log4j2 monorepo to v2.23.0 - autoclosed #3100

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 23, 2024

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Feb 21, 2024

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
org.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-core (source) 2.22.1 -> 2.23.0 age adoption passing confidence
org.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-api (source) 2.22.1 -> 2.23.0 age adoption passing confidence

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Feb 21, 2024

Coverage Status

coverage: 87.116%. remained the same
when pulling 606725e on renovate/log4j2-monorepo
into 2325f29 on master.

@hazendaz hazendaz self-assigned this Feb 23, 2024
@hazendaz hazendaz merged commit 08adfb3 into master Feb 23, 2024
36 checks passed
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update log4j2 monorepo to v2.23.0 chore(deps): update log4j2 monorepo to v2.23.0 - autoclosed Feb 23, 2024
@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/log4j2-monorepo branch February 23, 2024 01:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants