Use buildinfo

[rkscv]

I tested gup list locally and it's about 150x faster now.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Refactor
  • Simplified logic for retrieving package information, improving error handling.
• Tests
  • Updated and removed specific test functions to align with the new logic.
• Chores
  • Minor updates to example outputs and removal of unused functions.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The changes streamline the handling of Go module and package information. By removing specific functions and tests related to extracting module paths and version information, and instead utilizing the buildinfo.ReadFile for package data retrieval, the update simplifies logic and improves error handling. This makes the codebase cleaner and more efficient, focusing on direct methods for obtaining necessary information without redundant steps.

Changes

File Path	Change Summary
.../examples_test.go	- Removed ExampleGoVersionWithOptionM - Updated ExampleGoBin output
.../goutil.go	- Replaced GoVersionWithOptionM with buildinfo.ReadFile - Removed extraction of paths using go version -m
.../goutil_test.go	- Removed tests for path extraction - Updated error message in TestGetPackageInformation_unknown_module

🐇✨
In the warren of the code, where the bits and bytes abide,
A rabbit hopped through lines so wide, with changes made with pride.
Gone are paths once tread in vain, simpleness now our guide,
With every leap, a cleaner strain, in efficiency we confide.
So here's to code that's neat and bright, our efforts unified!
🌟🐾

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

---

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
  • Generate unit-tests for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

[coderabbitai]

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 75be3f2 and c111018.

Files selected for processing (3)

• internal/goutil/examples_test.go (1 hunks)
• internal/goutil/goutil.go (4 hunks)
• internal/goutil/goutil_test.go (2 hunks)

Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)

• internal/goutil/examples_test.go

Additional comments: 2

internal/goutil/goutil.go (1)

• 292-306: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [295-322]

The implementation of GetPackageInformation and GetPackageVersion using buildinfo.ReadFile is a significant improvement in terms of performance and simplicity. However, there are a few considerations and potential improvements:

1. Error Handling and Logging: While print.Warn(err) on line 297 is a good practice for non-critical errors, ensure that this approach aligns with the overall error handling strategy of the application. It's important to consider if there are any scenarios where failing to read build info should result in more than just a warning.

2. Performance Consideration: The use of buildinfo.ReadFile is indeed more efficient than parsing command output. However, consider caching the results of buildinfo.ReadFile if this function is called multiple times for the same binary within a short period, to avoid unnecessary I/O operations.

3. Documentation: Given the significant change in how package information is retrieved, updating the documentation or comments to reflect the new method and its benefits would be helpful for future maintainers.

internal/goutil/goutil_test.go (1)

• 92-92: Updating the error message in TestGetPackageInformation_unknown_module to match the new implementation is a good practice for maintaining accurate tests. However, consider adding more detailed tests for GetPackageInformation to cover various scenarios, including successful reads, partial failures, and complete failures. This will ensure the robustness of the new implementation.

[coderabbitai]

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between c111018 and e43a5a8.

Files selected for processing (1)

• cmd/export_test.go (1 hunks)

Additional comments: 2

cmd/export_test.go (2)

• 189-189: The update to include the specific file path in the error message is a good practice for clarity and debugging. This change aligns well with the PR's objective of improving error handling.
• 186-192: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [1-255]

The test functions in this file are well-structured and make good use of table-driven tests and cmp.Diff for comparing expected and actual results. These practices contribute to the clarity, maintainability, and coverage of the tests.

[nao1215]

@rkscv
Thank you for the PR.

In the past, we discussed buildinfo in PR #6 . At that time, go 1.18 was new, so we postponed the introduction. Now that go 1.22 has been released, I think it's fine to use buildinfo.