Update README and unit test

[nao1215]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores

  • Updated the list of contributors to include a new member, rkscv.

• Documentation

  • Updated the README to reflect the new total count of contributors and added acknowledgment for rkscv.

• Tests

  • Added a test to verify the functionality of opening a browser with a specific URL on Linux systems.

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Rate Limit Exceeded

@nao1215 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 15 minutes and 23 seconds before requesting another review.

How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.
Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.
Please see our FAQ for further information.

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1b6c263 and b2aeca4.

Walkthrough

The project has welcomed a new contributor, rkscv, who has made their mark by adding code contributions. This addition is reflected in both the .all-contributorsrc file and the README.md, where the total contributor count has been updated to 9, and rkscv is acknowledged with their avatar. Additionally, a new test function for the Linux platform has been introduced to verify the functionality of opening a browser with a specific URL, enhancing the project's robustness.

Changes

File	Change Summary
.all-contributorsrc, README.md	Added rkscv as a contributor with code contributions. Updated contributor count to 9 and added rkscv to the list of acknowledgments.
cmd/.../bug_report.go	Modified bugReport function to take an additional openBrowser parameter.
cmd/.../bug_report_linux_test.go	Added Test_openBrowser function to test opening a browser on Linux.
cmd/bug_report_test.go	Added Test_bugReport to test bugReport function with version number validation.

🐰✨

In the code's gentle weave,
A new contributor, do believe!
Tests that dance and gleam in the night,
Ensuring every URL takes flight.
Together we hop, in code we trust,
Building a future, from dawn to dusk.
🥕🎉

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

---

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
  • Generate unit-tests for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

[coderabbitai]

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7f46f0d and 50db1ed.

Files selected for processing (3)

• .all-contributorsrc (1 hunks)
• README.md (2 hunks)
• cmd/bug_report_linux_test.go (1 hunks)

Additional comments: 4

cmd/bug_report_linux_test.go (1)

• 10-19: The test implementation for Test_openBrowser is clear and follows the intended logic to skip on non-Linux systems. However, for enhanced testability and to avoid side effects during test runs (such as actually opening a browser), consider using a mock or an interface for the system calls involved in openBrowser. This approach would allow you to assert the behavior without executing the external command.

.all-contributorsrc (1)

• 82-89: The addition of the new contributor "rkscv" is correctly formatted and consistent with the structure of the .all-contributorsrc file. It's important to ensure that the contribution type accurately reflects the individual's contributions to the project.

README.md (2)

• 2-2: The update to the all-contributors badge count from 8 to 9 accurately reflects the addition of a new contributor. It's important to keep this count updated to recognize all contributors accurately.
• 236-236: The addition of the new contributor "rkscv" is correctly formatted and consistent with the project's acknowledgment section in the README. It's great to see the project actively recognizing contributions in this manner.

[coderabbitai]

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 1

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 50db1ed and 1b6c263.

Files selected for processing (3)

• cmd/bug_report.go (1 hunks)
• cmd/bug_report_linux_test.go (1 hunks)
• cmd/bug_report_test.go (1 hunks)

Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)

• cmd/bug_report_linux_test.go

Additional comments: 2

cmd/bug_report.go (2)

• 18-18: The modification to pass the openBrowser function to bugReport is correctly implemented.
• 26-26: Consider enhancing user feedback when the browser cannot be opened. Currently, the function prints the bug report template to the console, which is a good fallback. However, adding a log message or some form of error notification could improve user experience by explicitly stating that the attempt to open the browser failed.

[github-actions]

HOTTEST report

PASS	FAIL	SKIP	TOTAL	DURATION
142	0	0	142	3.329797787s

---

Reported by hottest

[github-actions]

Code Metrics Report

	main (7f46f0d)	#135 (471e4af)	+/-
Coverage	77.2%	79.1%	+1.9%
Test Execution Time	6s	7s	+1s

Details

  |                     | main (7f46f0d) | #135 (471e4af) |  +/-  |
  |---------------------|----------------|----------------|-------|
+ | Coverage            |          77.2% |          79.1% | +1.9% |
  |   Files             |             20 |             20 |     0 |
  |   Lines             |            741 |            741 |     0 |
+ |   Covered           |            572 |            586 |   +14 |
- | Test Execution Time |             6s |             7s |   +1s |

Code coverage of files in pull request scope (6.7% → 80.0%)

Files	Coverage	+/-
cmd/bug_report.go	80.0%	+73.3%

---

Reported by octocov