Fix #113, Use size_t
for size parameters and variables
#114
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Checklist
Describe the contribution
size_t
for size parameters/variables #113size_t
typedef.DS_TableEntryUnused()
parameterBufferSize
was signed previous to this change, but it is actually used in DS withsize_t
types being passed in to that parameteri
inDS_TableEntryUnused()
to unsigned for clarity/defensivenessNote: there is a signed/unsigned comparison in
DS_FileWriteData()
, but I know there are many other cases of this in cFS currently.Testing performed
GitHub CI actions all passing successfully (incl. Build + Run, Unit/Functional Tests etc.).
Expected behavior changes
No change to overall behavior.
Code is more compliant with relevant coding standards (JPL, MISRA etc. which all prefer the more expressive typedefs where possible).
Contributor Info
Avi Weiss @thnkslprpt