We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Failure: Coverage lc lines 99.6% functions 100.0% branches 94.3%
Other coverage failures: Failure: Coverage cs lines 99.9% functions 100.0% branches 99.1% Failure: Coverage ds lines 99.6% functions 100.0% branches 97.7% Failure: Coverage fm lines 93.8% functions 94.0% branches 89.1% Failure: Coverage hs lines 100.0% functions 100.0% branches 98.1% Failure: Coverage md lines 98.4% functions 100.0% branches 96.7% Failure: Coverage sc lines 99.9% functions 100.0% branches 99.0%
Fix where possible, elsewise Issues should document all uncovered lines/branches and disposition (why it's ok as-is)
Imported from GSFCCFS-1935
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Fix nasa#22, Improve UT code coverage
426dde9
Merge pull request #37 from skliper/fix22-code_coverage
7049399
Fix #17 #22, Code coverage improvements
skliper
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
Failure: Coverage lc lines 99.6% functions 100.0% branches 94.3%
Other coverage failures:
Failure: Coverage cs lines 99.9% functions 100.0% branches 99.1%
Failure: Coverage ds lines 99.6% functions 100.0% branches 97.7%
Failure: Coverage fm lines 93.8% functions 94.0% branches 89.1%
Failure: Coverage hs lines 100.0% functions 100.0% branches 98.1%
Failure: Coverage md lines 98.4% functions 100.0% branches 96.7%
Failure: Coverage sc lines 99.9% functions 100.0% branches 99.0%
Fix where possible, elsewise Issues should document all uncovered lines/branches and disposition (why it's ok as-is)
Imported from GSFCCFS-1935
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: