-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 206
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix #2465, add multi threaded SB perf tests #2466
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
CodeQL-coding-standard found more than 10 potential problems in the proposed changes. Check the Files changed tab for more details.
jphickey
added
the
CCB:Ready
Ready for discussion at the Configuration Control Board (CCB)
label
Nov 17, 2023
jphickey
force-pushed
the
fix-2465-sb-benchmarks
branch
from
November 17, 2023 18:06
aa3e8f2
to
f95494a
Compare
Add multi-thread variants of the SB bulk transfer tests. The intent is to create some contention on the SB shared data mutex between the threads. This more closely resembles real use cases where different threads are doing sending and receving simultaneously.
jphickey
force-pushed
the
fix-2465-sb-benchmarks
branch
from
November 21, 2023 21:12
f95494a
to
c83a193
Compare
dzbaker
added
CCB:Approved
Indicates code review and approval by community CCB
and removed
CCB:Ready
Ready for discussion at the Configuration Control Board (CCB)
labels
Nov 30, 2023
dzbaker
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 5, 2023
Fix #2465, add multi threaded SB perf tests
2 tasks
dzbaker
added a commit
to nasa/cFS
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 5, 2023
*Combines:* to_lab v2.5.0-rc4+dev71 ci_lab v2.5.0-rc4+dev77 cFE v7.0.0-rc4+dev427 PSP v1.6.0-rc4+dev102 osal v6.0.0-rc4+dev243 **Includes:** *to_lab* - nasa/to_lab#173 *ci_lab* - nasa/ci_lab#157 - nasa/ci_lab#159 - nasa/ci_lab#161 *cFE* - nasa/cFE#2411 - nasa/cFE#2409 - nasa/cFE#2373 - nasa/cFE#2466 - nasa/cFE#2468 - nasa/cFE#2470 *PSP* - nasa/PSP#421 *osal* - nasa/osal#1413 Co-authored by: Joseph Hickey <jphickey@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored by: Isaac Rowe <irowebbn@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored by: Jacob Hageman <skliper@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored by: Frank Kühndel <frank-kue@users.noreply.github.com>
dzbaker
added a commit
to nasa/cFS
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 5, 2023
*Combines:* to_lab v2.5.0-rc4+dev71 ci_lab v2.5.0-rc4+dev77 cFE v7.0.0-rc4+dev424 PSP v1.6.0-rc4+dev102 osal v6.0.0-rc4+dev243 **Includes:** *to_lab* - nasa/to_lab#173 *ci_lab* - nasa/ci_lab#157 - nasa/ci_lab#159 - nasa/ci_lab#161 *cFE* - nasa/cFE#2409 - nasa/cFE#2373 - nasa/cFE#2466 - nasa/cFE#2468 - nasa/cFE#2470 *PSP* - nasa/PSP#421 *osal* - nasa/osal#1413 Co-authored by: Joseph Hickey <jphickey@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored by: Isaac Rowe <irowebbn@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored by: Jacob Hageman <skliper@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored by: Frank Kühndel <frank-kue@users.noreply.github.com>
dzbaker
added a commit
to nasa/cFS
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 5, 2023
*Combines:* to_lab v2.5.0-rc4+dev71 ci_lab v2.5.0-rc4+dev77 cFE v7.0.0-rc4+dev424 PSP v1.6.0-rc4+dev102 osal v6.0.0-rc4+dev243 **Includes:** *to_lab* - nasa/to_lab#173 *ci_lab* - nasa/ci_lab#157 - nasa/ci_lab#159 - nasa/ci_lab#161 *cFE* - nasa/cFE#2409 - nasa/cFE#2373 - nasa/cFE#2466 - nasa/cFE#2468 - nasa/cFE#2470 *PSP* - nasa/PSP#421 *osal* - nasa/osal#1413 Co-authored by: Joseph Hickey <jphickey@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored by: Isaac Rowe <irowebbn@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored by: Jacob Hageman <skliper@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored by: Frank Kühndel <frank-kue@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Checklist (Please check before submitting)
Describe the contribution
Add multi-thread variants of the SB bulk transfer tests. The intent is to create some contention on the SB shared data mutex between the threads. This more closely resembles real use cases where different threads are doing sending and receving simultaneously.
Fixes #2465
Testing performed
Run performance test
Expected behavior changes
Demonstrates how well the SB code scales across threads (or not)
System(s) tested on
Debian
Contributor Info - All information REQUIRED for consideration of pull request
Joseph Hickey, Vantage Systems, Inc.