Fix #125, Standardize CI_LAB function names

[thnkslprpt]

Checklist

• I reviewed the Contributing Guide.
• I signed and emailed the appropriate Contributor License Agreement to GSFC-SoftwareRelease@mail.nasa.gov and copied cfs-program@lists.nasa.gov.

Describe the contribution

• Fixes Apply standard naming convention (CI_LAB...) #125
  • Standardize naming of CI_LAB functions to match predominant cFS style.
  • Updates the list of command codes in ci_lab_msg.h in order for CHeaderParser.py to correctly generate the full list of commands in the CI_LAB_CMD binary file.

Also requires a change to the cfe startup script
A few files in the Ground System should also be updated to match the predominant convention.

Testing performed
Only GitHub CI workflow actions.

Expected behavior changes
No impact on behavior.

Contributor Info
@thnkslprpt

[thnkslprpt]

CHeaderParser.py uses ci_lab_msg.h to generate the CI_LAB_CMD binary which defines the commands that are listed in the Ground System display window for ci_lab.

I had to update the list of command codes in ci_lab_msg.h (2nd commit in this PR) in order for CHeaderParser.py to generate the full list of commands in the CI_LAB_CMD binary. Without updating ci_lab_msg.h only the 2 command codes that were already listed in ci_lab_msg.h will be populated in the display window for ci_lab in the Ground System.

After updating it, the CI_LAB_CMD binary seems to be generated correctly and the Ground System correctly displays all of the commands and runs them without error.

If this change would be better as a separate issue, just let me know.

[dzbaker]

@thnkslprpt CCB 20 October 2022: Approved pending workflow failure resolution (squash commits?)

[thnkslprpt]

@thnkslprpt CCB 20 October 2022: Approved pending workflow failure resolution (squash commits?)

Squashed now @dzbaker
Note: goes along with nasa/cFE#2170