-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ogma-cli
: Cabal package description does not list FPrime backend
#91
Comments
Change Manager: Confirmed that the issue exists. |
Technical Lead: Confirmed that the issue should be addressed. |
Technical Lead: Issue scheduled for Ogma 1.(0+X).(8+Y). Fix assigned to: @ivanperez-keera. |
…ription. Refs #91. The cabal package description does not list the FPrime backend among the use cases supported. This commit lists generating F' monitoring components as one of the supported use cases.
The cabal package description does not provide a link to the FPrime repo under "further information", but it does provide one for other backends. This commit lists the F' repository as a reference link in the package description in the cabal file.
…ription. Refs #91. The cabal package description does not list the FPrime backend among the use cases supported. This commit lists generating F' monitoring components as one of the supported use cases.
The cabal package description does not provide a link to the FPrime repo under "further information", but it does provide one for other backends. This commit lists the F' repository as a reference link in the package description in the cabal file.
Implementor: Solution implemented, review requested. |
Change Manager: Verified that:
|
Change Manager: Implementation ready to be merged. |
Description
The cabal package description does not list the FPrime backend among the use cases supported.
Type
Additional context
Issue #77 should have included this change.
Requester
Method to check presence of bug
The issue is with the documentation. There is no good, simple automated way to check that it is correct.
Because it's not a programming issue, visual inspection is OK.
Expected result
The cabal package description mentions that we have an FPrime backend.
Desired result
The cabal package description mentions that we have an FPrime backend.
Proposed solution
Modify cabal package description to list FPrime backend as another supported use case.
Add link to FPrime under "further information".
Further notes
Normally, the addition of new information to the description would be considered a feature. In this case, however, this should have been included as part of the feature that added support for FPrime. It was an oversight not to list this backend also in the cabal description. Consequently, this is classified as a (documentation) bug.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: