Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ADDED] TermWithReason method on JetStream message #1539

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 30, 2024
Merged

Conversation

piotrpio
Copy link
Collaborator

Signed-off-by: Piotr Piotrowski piotr@synadia.com

Signed-off-by: Piotr Piotrowski <piotr@synadia.com>
// the value of MaxDeliver. The provided reason will be included in JetStream
// advisory event sent by the server.
//
// Note: This will only work with JetStream servers >= 2.10.4.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

would result in a timeout error right since implementation uses ackReply?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

But ackReply does a simple publish on a JS reply subject, it does not wait for server ack (only DoubleAck does that). So it would simply work as if the message was not terminated and will eventually be redelivered.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah, i always get confused with this method name, you're right.

Signed-off-by: Piotr Piotrowski <piotr@synadia.com>
@ripienaar ripienaar self-requested a review January 30, 2024 12:27
Copy link
Contributor

@ripienaar ripienaar left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@piotrpio piotrpio merged commit 73dc520 into main Jan 30, 2024
2 checks passed
@piotrpio piotrpio deleted the term-with-reason branch January 30, 2024 13:15
@piotrpio piotrpio mentioned this pull request Feb 14, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants