Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fsx: fix regression that made fsxc misbehave #44

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 3, 2024
Merged

Conversation

knocte
Copy link
Member

@knocte knocte commented Sep 3, 2024

In a geewallet's PR[1] I bisected the problem to this commit: dd66eb3.

So I'm basically reverting that commit here, but I still don't understand why it would cause such a regression. The problem is that fsxc is not able to compile anymore certain scripts and spits some errors that look to be warnings, such as:

Error: D:\a\geewallet\geewallet\scripts\bin\downloadUbuntuDeps.fsx.fs(14,1): error FS0020: The result of this expression has type 'int' and is implicitly ignored. Consider using
'ignore' to discard this value explicitly, e.g. 'expr |> ignore', or 'let' to bind the result to a name, e.g. 'let result = expr'.
[D:\a\geewallet\geewallet\scripts\bin\downloadUbuntuDeps.fsx.fsproj]

[1] nblockchain/geewallet#289

In a geewallet's PR[1] I bisected the problem to this commit:
dd66eb3.

So I'm basically reverting that commit here, but I still don't
understand why it would cause such a regression. The problem
is that fsxc is not able to compile anymore certain scripts
and spits some errors that look to be warnings, such as:

```
Error: D:\a\geewallet\geewallet\scripts\bin\downloadUbuntuDeps.fsx.fs(14,1): error FS0020: The result of this expression has type 'int' and is implicitly ignored. Consider using
'ignore' to discard this value explicitly, e.g. 'expr |> ignore', or 'let' to bind the result to a name, e.g. 'let result = expr'.
[D:\a\geewallet\geewallet\scripts\bin\downloadUbuntuDeps.fsx.fsproj]
```

[1] nblockchain/geewallet#289
@knocte knocte merged commit b235ee8 into master Sep 3, 2024
30 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant