Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Update nep-0509.md
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
fix more lint warnings
  • Loading branch information
walnut-the-cat authored Jun 24, 2024
1 parent e498ab7 commit cf26420
Showing 1 changed file with 14 additions and 14 deletions.
28 changes: 14 additions & 14 deletions neps/nep-0509.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -532,23 +532,23 @@ The only real alternative that was considered is the original nightshade proposa

### Positive

- The validator nodes will need to track at most one shard.
- The state will be held in memory making the chunk application much faster.
- The disk space hardware requirement will decrease. The top 100 nodes will need to store at most 2 shards at a time and the remaining nodes will not need to store any shards.
- Thanks to the above, in the future, it will be possible to reduce the gas costs and by doing so increase the throughput of the system.
* The validator nodes will need to track at most one shard.
* The state will be held in memory making the chunk application much faster.
* The disk space hardware requirement will decrease. The top 100 nodes will need to store at most 2 shards at a time and the remaining nodes will not need to store any shards.
* Thanks to the above, in the future, it will be possible to reduce the gas costs and by doing so increase the throughput of the system.

### Neutral

- The current approach to resharding will need to be revised to support generating state witness.
- The security assumptions will change. The responsibility will be moved from block producers to chunk validators and the security will become probabilistic.
* The current approach to resharding will need to be revised to support generating state witness.
* The security assumptions will change. The responsibility will be moved from block producers to chunk validators and the security will become probabilistic.

### Negative

- The network bandwidth and memory hardware requirements will increase.
- The top 100 validators will need to store up to 2 shards in memory and participate in state witness distribution.
- The remaining validators will need to participate in state witness distribution.
- Additional limits will be put on the size of transactions, receipts and, more generally, cross shard communication.
- The dependency on cloud state sync will increase the centralization of the blockchain. This will be resolved separately by the decentralized state sync.
* The network bandwidth and memory hardware requirements will increase.
* The top 100 validators will need to store up to 2 shards in memory and participate in state witness distribution.
* The remaining validators will need to participate in state witness distribution.
* Additional limits will be put on the size of transactions, receipts and, more generally, cross shard communication.
* The dependency on cloud state sync will increase the centralization of the blockchain. This will be resolved separately by the decentralized state sync.

### Backwards Compatibility

Expand All @@ -558,9 +558,9 @@ The only real alternative that was considered is the original nightshade proposa

[Explain any issues that warrant further discussion. Considerations

- What parts of the design do you expect to resolve through the NEP process before this gets merged?
- What parts of the design do you expect to resolve through the implementation of this feature before stabilization?
- What related issues do you consider out of scope for this NEP that could be addressed in the future independently of the solution that comes out of this NEP?]
* What parts of the design do you expect to resolve through the NEP process before this gets merged?
* What parts of the design do you expect to resolve through the implementation of this feature before stabilization?
* What related issues do you consider out of scope for this NEP that could be addressed in the future independently of the solution that comes out of this NEP?]

## Changelog

Expand Down

0 comments on commit cf26420

Please sign in to comment.